Comments on "Mapping the scientific research on non-point source pollution: a bibliometric analysis" by Yang et al. (2017).

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

1. A bibliometric analysis of publications inRenal failure · 2023
   Review
2. Research Trends and Hotspots of Q Fever Research: A Bibliometric Analysis 1990-2019.BioMed research international · 2022
   Review
3. The Trend of Bacterial Nanocellulose Research Published in the Science Citation Index Expanded From 2005 to 2020: A Bibliometric Analysis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021
   Review
4. Some comments on: Yonoff et al. 'Research trends in proton exchange membrane fuel cells during 2008-2018: A bibliometric analysis',Heliyon · 2020
   Article
5. Rebuttal to: Li et al. "Dynamic analysis of international green behavior from the perspective of the mapping knowledge domain," Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol. 26, pp. 6087-6098.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2020
   Article
6. Some comments on using of Web of Science for bibliometric studies [Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Vol. 25].Environmental science and pollution research international · 2020
   Article
7. Comments on "Research on sulfur oxides and nitric oxides released from coal-fired flue gas and vehicle exhaust: a bibliometric analysis" by Wang et al. (2019).Environmental science and pollution research international · 2020
   Article
8. Comment to: Qi, Yi, et al. "Bibliometric Analysis of Algal-Bacterial Symbiosis in Wastewater Treatment",International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
   Article
9. Comment on Chen, J.; Su, Y.; Si, H.; Chen, J. Managerial Areas of Construction and Demolition Waste: A Scientometric Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
   Article
10. Commentary: Trends and Development in Enteral Nutrition Application for Ventilator Associated Pneumonia: A Scientometric Research Study (1996-2018).Frontiers in pharmacology · 2019
    Article
11. Comment on "The State of Exosomes Research: A Global Visualized Analysis" and "Current Research Trends in Traditional Chinese Medicine Formula: A Bibliometric Review from 2000 to 2016".BioMed research international · 2019
    Article
12. Trends in Paragonimiasis Global Research: Bibliometric Analysis of a Neglected Food-Borne Parasite.Iranian journal of parasitology
    Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Mapping the scientific research on non-point source pollution: a bibliometric analysis.2017

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as