ArticleEuropean radiology2018
Optimising preoperative risk stratification tools for prostate cancer using mpMRI.
Article in European radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prediction of extracapsular extension of prostate cancer by MRI radiomic signature: a systematic review.Insights into imaging · 2024Review
- A preoperative magnetic resonance imaging can aid in staging and treatment choice for upper tract urothelial carcinoma.BJUI compass · 2024Article
- MRI characteristics and oncological follow-up of patients with ISUP grade group 4 or 5 prostate cancer.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2024Article
- Microvascular proliferation is associated with high tumour blood flow by mpMRI and disease progression in primary prostate cancer.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Impact of prebiopsy MRI on prostate cancer staging: Results from the Norwegian Prostate Cancer Registry.BJUI compass · 2023Article
- Article
- Stromal FAP Expression is Associated with MRI Visibility and Patient Survival in Prostate Cancer.Cancer research communications · 2022Article
- Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival Among Patients With Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy Based on the Competing Risk Model: Population-Based Study.Frontiers in surgery · 2021Article
- MRI Characteristics Accurately Predict Biochemical Recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
- Assessing Extraprostatic Extension with Multiparametric MRI of the Prostate: Mehralivand Extraprostatic Extension Grade or Extraprostatic Extension Likert Scale?Radiology. Imaging cancer · 2020Article
- Can We Improve the Preoperative Prediction of Prostate Cancer Recurrence With Multiparametric MRI?Clinical genitourinary cancer · 2019Article
- Development and validation of a prognostic index for efficacy evaluation and prognosis of first-line chemotherapy in stage III-IV lung squamous cell carcinoma.European radiology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo improve preoperative risk stratification for prostate cancer (PCa) by incorporating multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) features into risk stratification tools for PCa, CAPRA and D'Amico.
methods807 consecutive patients operated on by robot-assisted radical prostatectomy at our institution during the period 2010-2015 were followed to identify biochemical recurrence (BCR). 591 patients were eligible for final analysis. We employed stepwise backward likelihood methodology and penalised Cox cross-validation to identify the most significant predictors of BCR including mpMRI features. mpMRI features were then integrated into image-adjusted (IA) risk prediction models and the two risk prediction tools were then evaluated both with and without image adjustment using receiver operating characteristics, survival and decision curve analyses.
results37 patients suffered BCR. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and radiological extraprostatic extension (rEPE) from mpMRI were both significant predictors of BCR. Both IA prediction models reallocated more than 20% of intermediate-risk patients to the low-risk group, reducing their estimated cumulative BCR risk from approximately 5% to 1.1%. Both IA models showed improved prognostic performance with a better separation of the survival curves.
conclusionIntegrating ADC and rEPE from mpMRI of the prostate into risk stratification tools improves preoperative risk estimation for BCR. KEY POINTS: • MRI-derived features, ADC and EPE, improve risk stratification of biochemical recurrence. • Using mpMRI to stratify prostate cancer patients improves the differentiation between risk groups. • Using preoperative mpMRI will help urologists in selecting the most appropriate treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.