Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28986636›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2018

Optimising preoperative risk stratification tools for prostate cancer using mpMRI.

Lars A R Reisæter, Jurgen J Fütterer, Are Losnegård, Yngve Nygård, Jan Monssen, Karsten Gravdal, Ole J Halvorsen, Lars A Akslen, Martin Biermann, Svein Haukaas and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Lars A R ReisæterDepartment of Radiology, Haukeland University Hospital, Jonas Liesvei, N-5021, Bergen, Norway. lars.reisaeter@helse-bergen.no.
Jurgen J FüttererDepartment of Radiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Are LosnegårdDepartment of Radiology, Haukeland University Hospital, Jonas Liesvei, N-5021, Bergen, Norway.
Yngve NygårdDepartment of Urology, Haukeland University Hospital, N-5021, Bergen, Norway.
Jan MonssenDepartment of Radiology, Haukeland University Hospital, Jonas Liesvei, N-5021, Bergen, Norway.
Karsten GravdalDepartment of Pathology, Haukeland University Hospital, N-5021, Bergen, Norway.
Ole J HalvorsenDepartment of Pathology, Haukeland University Hospital, N-5021, Bergen, Norway.
Lars A AkslenDepartment of Pathology, Haukeland University Hospital, N-5021, Bergen, Norway.
Martin BiermannDepartment of Radiology, Haukeland University Hospital, Jonas Liesvei, N-5021, Bergen, Norway.
Svein HaukaasDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Jarle RørvikDepartment of Radiology, Haukeland University Hospital, Jonas Liesvei, N-5021, Bergen, Norway.
Christian BeislandDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo improve preoperative risk stratification for prostate cancer (PCa) by incorporating multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) features into risk stratification tools for PCa, CAPRA and D'Amico.

methods807 consecutive patients operated on by robot-assisted radical prostatectomy at our institution during the period 2010-2015 were followed to identify biochemical recurrence (BCR). 591 patients were eligible for final analysis. We employed stepwise backward likelihood methodology and penalised Cox cross-validation to identify the most significant predictors of BCR including mpMRI features. mpMRI features were then integrated into image-adjusted (IA) risk prediction models and the two risk prediction tools were then evaluated both with and without image adjustment using receiver operating characteristics, survival and decision curve analyses.

results37 patients suffered BCR. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and radiological extraprostatic extension (rEPE) from mpMRI were both significant predictors of BCR. Both IA prediction models reallocated more than 20% of intermediate-risk patients to the low-risk group, reducing their estimated cumulative BCR risk from approximately 5% to 1.1%. Both IA models showed improved prognostic performance with a better separation of the survival curves.

conclusionIntegrating ADC and rEPE from mpMRI of the prostate into risk stratification tools improves preoperative risk estimation for BCR. KEY POINTS: • MRI-derived features, ADC and EPE, improve risk stratification of biochemical recurrence. • Using mpMRI to stratify prostate cancer patients improves the differentiation between risk groups. • Using preoperative mpMRI will help urologists in selecting the most appropriate treatment.

Indexed as

AgedHumansKallikreinsKaplan-Meier EstimateMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPreoperative CarePrognosisProstatectomyProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsRobotic Surgical ProceduresKallikreinsKLK3 protein, humanProstate-Specific AntigenBiochemical recurrenceMRIProstate cancerProstate mpMRIRisk stratification

Identifiers

PMID28986636
PMCPMC5811593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.