ArticleDer Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft2018
[Health-related quality of life after implantation of a keratoprosthesis with biological haptic].
Article in Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMany studies report comparatively good long-term results among patients with keratoprostheses with biological haptic. However, overall costs are correspondingly high. A clear cost-benefit relationship is therefore desirable.
objectiveThis study investigates health-related quality of life after implantation of a keratoprosthesis with biological haptic. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe present a retrospective analysis of medical data of 25 patients treated between 1996 and 2006 at the Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Homburg/Saar and the Klinikum Offenburg. Health-related quality of life was assessed by means of a questionnaire based on validated instruments, with particular emphasis on physical symptoms, mental health, functional limitations, and social interactions.
resultsAt a patient age of 49.8 ± 15.7 years (minimum-maximum: 19-78 years; 6 female, 19 male), the mean duration of corneal blindness was 13.8 ± 13.1 years (minimum-maximum: 1-47 years). Changes in visual acuity and subjective satisfaction were statistically significant (p <0.001). Quality of life (on a scale of 1 to 6: median 2) at the time "before the onset of eye disease" and ≥15 months after surgery were identical. Patients with a postoperative visual acuity ≤0.1 (n =11) also showed a statistically significant (p =0.016) benefit in this context.
conclusionThe expenditures and costs of keratoprosthetics can be justified by an improvement in the health-related quality of life of the persons concerned. Even a postoperative visual acuity of ≤0.1 correlates with a statistically significant improvement in the subjective quality of life of these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28986623What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.