Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28986581›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Nucleosome stability measured in situ by automated quantitative imaging.

László Imre, Zoltán Simándi, Attila Horváth, György Fenyőfalvi, Péter Nánási, Erfaneh Firouzi Niaki, Éva Hegedüs, Zsolt Bacsó, Urbain Weyemi, Rebekka Mauser and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Nucleosome destabilization by polyamines.Archives of biochemistry and biophysics · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The cell nucleus. A study in Burgundy.Nucleus (Austin, Tex.) · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

László ImreDepartment of Biophysics and Cell Biology, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, H-4032, Hungary.
Zoltán SimándiDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, H-4032, Hungary.
Attila HorváthDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, H-4032, Hungary.
György FenyőfalviDepartment of Biophysics and Cell Biology, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, H-4032, Hungary.
Péter NánásiDepartment of Biophysics and Cell Biology, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, H-4032, Hungary.
Erfaneh Firouzi NiakiDepartment of Biophysics and Cell Biology, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, H-4032, Hungary.
Éva HegedüsDepartment of Biophysics and Cell Biology, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, H-4032, Hungary.
Zsolt BacsóDepartment of Biophysics and Cell Biology, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, H-4032, Hungary.
Urbain WeyemiCenter for Cancer Research National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, 20892, USA.
Rebekka MauserInstitute of Biochemistry, Stuttgart University, Stuttgart, Germany.
Juan AusioUniversity of Victoria, Department of Biochemistry, Victoria, BC, V8W 3P6, Canada.
Albert JeltschInstitute of Biochemistry, Stuttgart University, Stuttgart, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6113-9290
William BonnerCenter for Cancer Research National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, 20892, USA.
László NagyDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, H-4032, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0001-6653-2155
Hiroshi KimuraCell Biology Unit, Institute of Innovative Research, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Yokohama, 226-8501, Japan.
Gábor SzabóDepartment of Biophysics and Cell Biology, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, H-4032, Hungary. szabog@med.unideb.hu.
University of Debrecen · HUNational Cancer Institute · USUniversity of Stuttgart · DETokyo Institute of Technology · JPUniversity of Victoria · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current approaches have limitations in providing insight into the functional properties of particular nucleosomes in their native molecular environment. Here we describe a simple and powerful method involving elution of histones using intercalators or salt, to assess stability features dependent on DNA superhelicity and relying mainly on electrostatic interactions, respectively, and measurement of the fraction of histones remaining chromatin-bound in the individual nuclei using histone type- or posttranslational modification- (PTM-) specific antibodies and automated, quantitative imaging. The method has been validated in H3K4me3 ChIP-seq experiments, by the quantitative assessment of chromatin loop relaxation required for nucleosomal destabilization, and by comparative analyses of the intercalator and salt induced release from the nucleosomes of different histones. The accuracy of the assay allowed us to observe examples of strict association between nucleosome stability and PTMs across cell types, differentiation state and throughout the cell-cycle in close to native chromatin context, and resolve ambiguities regarding the destabilizing effect of H2A.X phosphorylation. The advantages of the in situ measuring scenario are demonstrated via the marked effect of DNA nicking on histone eviction that underscores the powerful potential of topological relaxation in the epigenetic regulation of DNA accessibility.

Indexed as

Imaging, Three-DimensionalAnimalsAutomationCell Line, TumorDoxorubicinEthidiumHumansMiceNucleosomesSaltsDoxorubicinEthidiumNucleosomesSalts

Identifiers

PMID28986581
PMCPMC5630628
OpenAlexW2762959283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.