Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28986029›Full record

Trial reportThe lancet. HIV2018

Daily and non-daily pre-exposure prophylaxis in African women (HPTN 067/ADAPT Cape Town Trial): a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial.

Linda-Gail Bekker, Surita Roux, Elaine Sebastien, Ntando Yola, K Rivet Amico, James P Hughes, Mark A Marzinke, Craig W Hendrix, Peter L Anderson, Vanessa Elharrar and 9 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The lancet. HIV, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01327651 (The ADAPT Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 89 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
89citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
9.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01327651 phase2completednot on this map

The ADAPT Study: A Phase II, Randomized, Open-Label, Pharmacokinetic and Behavioral Study of the Use of Intermittent Oral Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP)

TypeinterventionalSponsorHIV Prevention Trials NetworkRan2011 to 2014Enrolled622ConditionsHIV InfectionsArmsDaily dosing, Time-driven dosing, Event-driven dosing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

89 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 117 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Early Adopters of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Preexposure Prophylaxis in a Population-based Combination Prevention Study in Rural Kenya and Uganda.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2018
    Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

29 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 11 institutions in 2 countries.

Linda-Gail BekkerThe Desmond Tutu HIV Centre, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa. Electronic address: Linda-Gail.Bekker@hiv-research.org.za.
Surita RouxSynexus Clinical Research SA, Somerset West, Cape Town, South Africa.
Elaine SebastienThe Desmond Tutu HIV Centre, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Ntando YolaThe Desmond Tutu HIV Centre, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
K Rivet AmicoSchool of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
James P HughesDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Mark A MarzinkeDepartment of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Craig W HendrixDepartment of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Peter L AndersonDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
Vanessa ElharrarDivision of AIDS, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD USA.
Michael StirrattDivision of AIDS Research, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD USA.
James F RooneyGilead Sciences, Foster City, CA, USA.
Estelle Piwowar-ManningDepartment of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Susan H EshlemanDepartment of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Laura McKinstryFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Maoji LiFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Bonnie J DyeFHI 360, Durham, NC, USA.
Robert M GrantGladstone Institutes, University of California, and San Francisco AIDS Foundation, San Francisco, CA, USA.
HPTN 067 (ADAPT) study team
Johns Hopkins University · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · USDesmond Tutu HIV Foundation · ZAFamily Health International 360 · USGilead Sciences (United States) · USGladstone Institutes · USNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases · USOffice of AIDS Research · USUniversity of Cape Town · ZAUniversity of Colorado Denver · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

LOC: HIV Prevention Trials NetworkUM1AI068619 · NIAID · FAMILY HEALTH INTERNATIONAL · PI Sinead Delany-Moretlwe, RAPHAEL J LANDOVITZ · 2011 to 2026
$779.5M
SDMC: HPTN 084 Pregnancy SupplementUM1AI068617 · NIAID · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Elizabeth Renata Brown, Deborah J Donnell · 2011 to 2026
$204.9M
LC: HIV Prevention Trials Network - Laboratory Support for the SARS-CoV-2 Seroprevalence Study (CoVPN 5002)UM1AI068613 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SUSAN H ESHLEMAN, Mark A Marzinke · 2011 to 2026
$100.2M
Chemoprophylaxis and HIV Host InteractionsR01AI118575 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GRANT, ROBERT M. · 2015 to 2019
$2.9M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI118575NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI068613NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI068617NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI068619
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe relative feasibility and acceptability of daily versus non-daily dosing of oral HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among women are unknown. We aimed to investigate the feasibility of non-daily PrEP regimens in adult women.

methodsWe did a randomised, open-label, phase 2 clinical trial (HPTN 067/ADAPT) of oral PrEP with emtricitabine plus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate at a research centre in Cape Town, South Africa. Participants were adult women (age ≥18 years) who received directly observed dosing once a week for 5 weeks followed by random assignment (1:1:1) at week 6 to one of three unblinded PrEP regimens for self-administered dosing over 24 weeks: daily; time-driven (twice a week plus a post-sex dose); or event-driven (one tablet both before and after sex). Primary outcomes were PrEP coverage (at least one dose within the 4 days before sex and one dose within 24 h after sex), pills needed or used to achieve regimen-specific adherence and coverage, and symptoms and side-effects. All analyses were by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01327651; the trial is completed and this report presents the final analysis.

findingsBetween Sept 12, 2011, and Oct 3, 2012, 191 women were enrolled to the trial. 178 (93%) completed directly observed dosing and were randomly assigned one of the three PrEP regimens for the self-administered phase: 59 were allocated the daily regimen, 59 the time-driven regimen, and 60 the event-driven regimen. Median age of women was 26 years (IQR 21-37; range 18-52). In women allocated the daily regimen, 1459 (75%) of 1952 sex events were covered by PrEP, compared with 599 (56%) of 1074 sex events among those assigned the time-driven regimen (odds ratio [OR] 2·35, 95% CI 1·43-3·83; p=0·0007) and 798 (52%) of 1542 sex events among those allotted the event-driven regimen (2·76, 1·68-4·53; p<0·0001). Fewer pills were needed for complete adherence in women allocated non-daily regimens (vs daily regimen, relative mean 2·53 [95% CI 2·39-2·69] for the time-driven regimen and 4·16 [3·59-4·82] for the event-driven regimen; p<0·0001). Side-effects were uncommon. Eight HIV seroconversions occurred overall, with four documented during the self-administered phase (two with the time-driven regimen and two with the event-driven regimen). Adherence to the assigned regimen was 75% (7283 of 9652 doses taken) for women allocated the daily regimen compared with 65% for those assigned the time-driven regimen (2367 of 3616 doses taken; p=0·0028) and 53% for those allotted the event-driven regimen (1161 of 2203 doses taken; p<0·0001). When sex was reported in the previous week, PrEP drugs were detected (above the lower limits of quantification) more frequently in women assigned the daily regimen (73 [68%] of 107 samples) than in those allocated the time-driven regimen (42 [58%] of 72 samples) and the event-driven regimen (41 [41%] of 99 samples).

interpretationDaily PrEP dosing resulted in higher coverage of sex events, increased adherence to the regimen, and augmented drug concentrations than did either time-driven or event-driven dosing. These findings support recommendations for daily use of PrEP with oral emtricitabine plus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in women.

fundingHIV Prevention Trials Network.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAdultAnti-HIV AgentsDrug Administration ScheduleEmtricitabineFeasibility StudiesFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMedication AdherencePre-Exposure ProphylaxisSouth AfricaTenofovirTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAnti-HIV AgentsEmtricitabineTenofovir

Identifiers

PMID28986029
PMCPMC6107917
OpenAlexW2763419945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.