Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28985929›Full record

ReviewNeuroimaging clinics of North America2017

Ten Key Observations on the Analysis of Resting-state Functional MR Imaging Data Using Independent Component Analysis.

Vince D Calhoun, Nina de Lacy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuroimaging clinics of North America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Unraveling the Neural Landscape of Mental Disorders Using Double Functional Independent Primitives.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Vince D CalhounThe Mind Research Network, 1101 Yale Boulevard Northeast, Albuquerque, NM 87106, USA; Department of ECE, University of New Mexico, 1 University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA. Electronic address: vcalhoun@unm.edu.
Nina de LacyDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.

Funding

NCCIH Supplement to NCATS/CTSA Program for KL2 Scholars - M. SoddersKL2TR002317 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Christy Michelle McKinney · 2017 to 2026
$14.5M
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Treatment of Auditory Verbal HalluciP20GM103472 · NIGMS · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI CALHOUN, VINCE D · 2012 to 2017
$14.3M
Institute of Translational Health SciencesKL2TR000421 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DISIS, MARY L. · 2012 to 2016
$12.6M
Multivariate methods for identifying multitask/multimodal brain imaging biomarkersR01EB006841 · NIBIB · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI VINCE D CALHOUN, Sergey Plis · 2007 to 2026
$9.8M
NEURAL MECHANISMS OF SCHIZOPHRENIAP20RR021938 · NCRR · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI HANLON, FAITH MARIE · 2008 to 2011
$9.4M
Multi-group semi-blind ICA of fMRIR01EB000840 · NIBIB · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI CALHOUN, VINCE D · 2003 to 2011
$3.2M
Unified multivariate data-driven solutions for static and dynamic brain connectivityR01EB020407 · NIBIB · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI ADALI, TULAY, CALHOUN, VINCE D · 2015 to 2018
$2.7M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000421NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002317NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR021938NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB000840NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB006841NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB020407NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103472
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For more than 20 years, the powerful, flexible family of independent component analysis (ICA) techniques has been used to examine spatial, temporal, and subject variation in functional magnetic resonance (fMR) imaging data. This article provides an overview of 10 key principles in the basic and advanced application of ICA to resting-state fMR imaging. ICA's core advantages include robustness to artifact; false-positives and autocorrelation; adaptability to variant study designs; agnosticism to the temporal evolution of fMR imaging signals; and ability to extract, identify, and analyze neural networks. ICA remains in the vanguard of fMRI methods development.

Indexed as

BrainBrain MappingHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeural PathwaysRestBrainConnectivityDynamicsfMR imagingFunctionGroup ICAIndependent component analysis

Identifiers

PMID28985929
PMCPMC5657522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.