Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28985849›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of surgical research2017

Treating a 20 mm Hg gradient alleviates myocardial hypertrophy in experimental aortic coarctation.

David C Wendell, Ingeborg Friehs, Margaret M Samyn, Leanne M Harmann, John F LaDisa

Open access · greenAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of surgical research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Virtual Planning and Patient-Specific Graft Design for Aortic Repairs.Cardiovascular engineering and technology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Clinical, Experimental, and Computational Validation of a New Doppler-Based Index for Coarctation Severity Assessment.Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

David C WendellDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Marquette University and Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Duke Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Ingeborg FriehsDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Margaret M SamynDepartment of Pediatrics, Herma Heart Center, Children's Hospital of Wisconsin and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Leanne M HarmannClinical and Translational Science Institute of Southeast Wisconsin, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
John F LaDisaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Marquette University and Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine and Physiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Electronic address: john.ladisa@marquette.edu.
Marquette University · USBoston Children's Hospital · USChildren's Hospital of Wisconsin · USMedical College of Wisconsin · US

Funding

Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR001436 · NCATS · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI FREED, JULIE K · 2015 to 2025
$47.5M
Quantifying altered hemodynamics in response to stenting for aortic coarctationR15HL096096 · NHLBI · MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY · PI LADISA, JOHN FRANK · 2009 to 2009
$228k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001436NHLBI NIH HHS R15 HL096096
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChildren with coarctation of the aorta (CoA) can have a hyperdynamic and remodeled left ventricle (LV) from increased afterload. Literature from an experimental model suggests the putative 20 mm Hg blood pressure gradient (BPG) treatment guideline frequently implemented in CoA studies may permit irreversible vascular changes. LV remodeling from pressure overload has been studied, but data are limited following correction and using a clinically representative BPG. MATERIALS AND

methodsRabbits underwent CoA at 10 weeks to induce a 20 mm Hg BPG using permanent or dissolvable suture thereby replicating untreated and corrected CoA, respectively. Cardiac function was evaluated at 32 weeks by magnetic resonance imaging using a spoiled cine GRE sequence (TR/TE/FA 8/2.9/20), 14 × 14-cm FOV, and 3-mm slice thickness. Images (20 frames/cycle) were acquired in 6-8 short axis views from the apex to the mitral valve annulus. LV volume, ejection fraction (EF), and mass were quantified.

resultsLV mass was elevated for CoA (5.2 ± 0.55 g) versus control (3.6 ± 0.16 g) and corrected (4.0 ± 0.44 g) rabbits, resulting in increased LV mass/volume ratio for CoA rabbits. A trend toward increased EF and stroke volume was observed but did not reach significance. Elevated EF by volumetric analysis in CoA rabbits was supported by concomitant increases in total aortic flow by phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging.

conclusionsThe indices quantified trended toward a persistent hyperdynamic LV despite correction, but differences were not statistically significant versus control rabbits. These findings suggest the current putative 20 mm Hg BPG for treatment may be reasonable from the LV's perspective.

Indexed as

AnimalsAortic CoarctationDisease Models, AnimalHypertrophy, Left VentricularMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleRabbitsRandom AllocationUltrasonographyAnimal modelCardiac functionCongenital heart disease

Identifiers

PMID28985849
PMCPMC5679105
OpenAlexW2647049935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.