Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28985698›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc2018

Application of real-time quantitative PCR assays for detecting marine Brucella spp. in fish.

Stephanie A Norman, Martha A Delaney, Katherine H Haman, Austen C Thomas, Jacques Godfroid, Anett K Larsen, Ingebjørg H Nymo, Suelee Robbe-Austerman, Christine Quance, Jack C Rhyan and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Serological Investigation forAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Veterinary sciences · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Stephanie A NormanMarine-Med, Bothell, WA (Norman).
Martha A DelaneyMarine-Med, Bothell, WA (Norman).
Katherine H HamanMarine-Med, Bothell, WA (Norman).
Austen C ThomasMarine-Med, Bothell, WA (Norman).
Jacques GodfroidMarine-Med, Bothell, WA (Norman).
Anett K LarsenMarine-Med, Bothell, WA (Norman).
Ingebjørg H NymoMarine-Med, Bothell, WA (Norman).
Suelee Robbe-AustermanMarine-Med, Bothell, WA (Norman).
Christine QuanceMarine-Med, Bothell, WA (Norman).
Jack C RhyanMarine-Med, Bothell, WA (Norman).
Dyanna M LambournMarine-Med, Bothell, WA (Norman).
Steven J JeffriesMarine-Med, Bothell, WA (Norman).
Peter RabinowitzMarine-Med, Bothell, WA (Norman).
University of Washington · USWashington Department of Fish and Wildlife · USMedford Radiology Group · USSmith-Root (United States) · USUiT The Arctic University of Norway · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brucella ceti and Brucella pinnipedialis have been documented as occurring in marine mammals, and B. ceti has been identified in 3 naturally acquired human cases. Seroconversion and infection patterns in Pacific Northwest harbor seals ( Phoca vitulina richardii) and North Atlantic hooded seals ( Cystophora cristata) indicate post-weaning exposure through prey consumption or lungworm infection, suggesting fish and possibly invertebrates play an epizootiologic role in marine Brucella transmission and possible foodborne risk to humans. We determined if real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) assays can detect marine Brucella DNA in fish DNA. Insertion sequence (IS) 711 gene and sequence type (ST)27 primer-probe sets were used to detect Brucella associated with marine mammals and human zoonotic infections, respectively. First, DNA extracts from paired-species fish (containing 2 species) samples were tested and determined to be Brucella DNA negative using both IS 711 and ST27 primer-probe sets. A representative paired-species fish DNA sample was spiked with decreasing concentrations of B. pinnipedialis DNA to verify Brucella detection by the IS 711 primer-probe within fish DNA. A standard curve, developed using isolated DNA from B. pinnipedialis, determined the limit of detection. Finally, the IS 711 primer-probe was used to test Atlantic cod ( Gadus morhua) DNA extracts experimentally infected with the B. pinnipedialis hooded seal strain. In culture-positive cod tissue, the IS 711 limit of detection was ~1 genome copy of Brucella. Agreement between culture and PCR results for the 9 positive and 9 negative cod tissues was 100%. Although a larger sample set is required for validation, our study shows that qPCR can detect marine Brucella in fish.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiological AssayBrucellaBrucellosisDNA Transposable ElementsFish DiseasesReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionDNA Transposable ElementsBrucella spp.cetaceanfishesIS711marinepinnipedreal-time PCRST27.

Identifiers

PMID28985698
PMCPMC6504141
OpenAlexW2763878755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.