Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28985671›Full record

ArticleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2017

Challenges and Opportunities of Nontraditional Approaches to Treating Bacterial Infections.

Brian N Tse, Amesh A Adalja, Christopher Houchens, Joseph Larsen, Thomas V Inglesby, Richard Hatchett

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Mechanistic Insights into the Anti-Virulence Effects ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. What Is New in the Anti-Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Brian N TseDivision of Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear (CBRN) Medical Countermeasures, Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response (ASPR), US Department of Health and Human Services (US DHHS), Washington, District of Columbia.
Amesh A AdaljaCenter for Health Security, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Christopher HouchensDivision of Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear (CBRN) Medical Countermeasures, Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response (ASPR), US Department of Health and Human Services (US DHHS), Washington, District of Columbia.
Joseph LarsenDivision of Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear (CBRN) Medical Countermeasures, Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response (ASPR), US Department of Health and Human Services (US DHHS), Washington, District of Columbia.
Thomas V InglesbyCenter for Health Security, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Richard HatchettBARDA, ASPR, US DHHS, Washington, District of Columbia.
Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Making Disasters Less Disastrous: Public Health, Healthcare Executives, and EmergU38CE002353 · CE · UPMC CENTER FOR HEALTH SECURITY, INC. · PI TONER, ERIC · 2013 to 2015
$589k
NCIPC CDC HHS U38 CE002353
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to increasing rates of antimicrobial-resistant infections and the current inadequacy of the antibiotic pipeline, there is increasing interest in nontraditional approaches to antibacterial therapies. We define "traditional" agents as small-molecule agents that directly target bacterial components to exert a bacteriostatic or bactericidal effect, and "nontraditional approaches" as antimicrobial therapeutics that work through other means (ie, not a small molecule and/or utilizes a nontraditional target). Due to their atypical features, such therapies may be less susceptible to the emergence of resistance than traditional antibiotics. They include approaches such as monoclonal antibodies, virulence disruptors, immunomodulators, phage therapies, microbiome-based therapies, antibiotic potentiators, and antisense approaches. This article discusses both the developmental and regulatory advantages and challenges associated with each of these technologies. By identifying existing regulatory and developmental gaps, we hope to provide a sense of where focusing resources may provide the greatest impact on successful product development.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalBacterial InfectionsDrug Resistance, BacterialFecal Microbiota TransplantationHumansImmunologic FactorsMicrobiotaPhage TherapyTherapeuticsAntibodies, MonoclonalImmunologic Factorsantibiotic resistanceantibodiesmicrobiomenontraditional approachesphage

Identifiers

PMID28985671
PMCPMC5634136
OpenAlexW2606820454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.