Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28985496›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics2017

DOMINO: Using Machine Learning to Predict Genes Associated with Dominant Disorders.

Mathieu Quinodoz, Beryl Royer-Bertrand, Katarina Cisarova, Silvio Alessandro Di Gioia, Andrea Superti-Furga, Carlo Rivolta

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of human genetics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 135 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A De NovoInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Rare heterozygous de novo variants in RAPGEF2 are associated with a neurodevelopmental disorder.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Genetics in medicine open · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mathieu QuinodozDepartment of Computational Biology, Unit of Medical Genetics, University of Lausanne, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Beryl Royer-BertrandDepartment of Computational Biology, Unit of Medical Genetics, University of Lausanne, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland; Division of Genetic Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Katarina CisarovaDepartment of Computational Biology, Unit of Medical Genetics, University of Lausanne, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Silvio Alessandro Di GioiaDepartment of Computational Biology, Unit of Medical Genetics, University of Lausanne, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Andrea Superti-FurgaDivision of Genetic Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Carlo RivoltaDepartment of Computational Biology, Unit of Medical Genetics, University of Lausanne, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland; Department of Genetics and Genome Biology, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 9HN, UK. Electronic address: carlo.rivolta@unil.ch.
University of Lausanne · CHUniversity of Leicester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In contrast to recessive conditions with biallelic inheritance, identification of dominant (monoallelic) mutations for Mendelian disorders is more difficult, because of the abundance of benign heterozygous variants that act as massive background noise (typically, in a 400:1 excess ratio). To reduce this overflow of false positives in next-generation sequencing (NGS) screens, we developed DOMINO, a tool assessing the likelihood for a gene to harbor dominant changes. Unlike commonly-used predictors of pathogenicity, DOMINO takes into consideration features that are the properties of genes, rather than of variants. It uses a machine-learning approach to extract discriminant information from a broad array of features (N = 432), including: genomic data, intra-, and interspecies conservation, gene expression, protein-protein interactions, protein structure, etc. DOMINO's iterative architecture includes a training process on 985 genes with well-established inheritance patterns for Mendelian conditions, and repeated cross-validation that optimizes its discriminant power. When validated on 99 newly-discovered genes with pathogenic mutations, the algorithm displays an excellent final performance, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.92. Furthermore, unsupervised analysis by DOMINO of real sets of NGS data from individuals with intellectual disability or epilepsy correctly recognizes known genes and predicts 9 new candidates, with very high confidence. In summary, DOMINO is a robust and reliable tool that can infer dominance of candidate genes with high sensitivity and specificity, making it a useful complement to any NGS pipeline dealing with the analysis of the morbid human genome.

Indexed as

Genes, DominantMachine LearningMutationSoftwareDatabases, GeneticGenetic Diseases, InbornGenome, HumanGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumans

Identifiers

PMID28985496
PMCPMC5630195
OpenAlexW2761369268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.