Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28985340›Full record

ArticleDNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes2018

Genome-wide mapping of large deletions and their population-genetic properties in dairy cattle.

Md Mesbah-Uddin, Bernt Guldbrandtsen, Terhi Iso-Touru, Johanna Vilkki, Dirk-Jan De Koning, Didier Boichard, Mogens Sandø Lund, Goutam Sahana

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review: Genomics of bull fertility.Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Md Mesbah-UddinDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, 8830 Tjele, Denmark.
Bernt GuldbrandtsenDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, 8830 Tjele, Denmark.
Terhi Iso-TouruGreen Technology, Natural Resources Institute Finland, FI-31600 Jokioinen, Finland.
Johanna VilkkiGreen Technology, Natural Resources Institute Finland, FI-31600 Jokioinen, Finland.
Dirk-Jan De KoningDepartment of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE-750?07 Uppsala, Sweden.
Didier BoichardAnimal Genetics and Integrative Biology, UMR 1313 GABI, INRA, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, 78350 Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Mogens Sandø LundDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, 8830 Tjele, Denmark.
Goutam SahanaDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, 8830 Tjele, Denmark.
Aarhus University · DKNatural Resources Institute Finland · FISwedish University of Agricultural Sciences · SEUniversité Paris-Saclay · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large genomic deletions are potential candidate for loss-of-function, which could be lethal as homozygote. Analysing whole genome data of 175 cattle, we report 8,480 large deletions (199 bp-773 KB) with an overall false discovery rate of 8.8%; 82% of which are novel compared with deletions in the dbVar database. Breakpoint sequence analyses revealed that majority (24 of 29 tested) of the deletions contain microhomology/homology at breakpoint, and therefore, most likely generated by microhomology-mediated end joining. We observed higher differentiation among breeds for deletions in some genic-regions, such as ABCA12, TTC1, VWA3B, TSHR, DST/BPAG1, and CD1D. The genes overlapping deletions are on average evolutionarily less conserved compared with known mouse lethal genes (P-value = 2.3 × 10-6). We report 167 natural gene knockouts in cattle that are apparently nonessential as live homozygote individuals are observed. These genes are functionally enriched for immunoglobulin domains, olfactory receptors, and MHC classes (FDR = 2.06 × 10-22, 2.06 × 10-22, 7.01 × 10-6, respectively). We also demonstrate that deletions are enriched for health and fertility related quantitative trait loci (2-and 1.5-fold enrichment, Fisher's P-value = 8.91 × 10-10 and 7.4 × 10-11, respectively). Finally, we identified and confirmed the breakpoint of a ∼525 KB deletion on Chr23:12,291,761-12,817,087 (overlapping BTBD9, GLO1 and DNAH8), causing stillbirth in Nordic Red Cattle.

Indexed as

dairy cattleloss-of-functionpopulation geneticsstructural variantswhole genome sequence

Identifiers

PMID28985340
PMCPMC5824824
OpenAlexW2753283399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.