ArticleGenome biology and evolution2017
Net Evolutionary Loss of Residue Polarity in Drosophilid Protein Cores Indicates Ongoing Optimization of Amino Acid Composition.
Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integration of sulfate assimilation with carbon and nitrogen metabolism in transition from C3 to C4 photosynthesis.Journal of experimental botany · 2019Review
- A Shift in Aggregation Avoidance Strategy Marks a Long-Term Direction to Protein Evolution.Genetics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Amino acid frequencies in proteins may not be at equilibrium. We consider two possible explanations for the nonzero net residue fluxes in drosophilid proteins. First, protein interiors may have a suboptimal residue composition and be under a selective pressure favoring stability, that is, leading to the loss of polar (and the gain of large) amino acids. One would then expect stronger net fluxes on the protein interior than at the exposed sites. Alternatively, if most of the polarity loss occurs at the exposed sites and the selective constraint on amino acid composition at such sites decreases over time, net loss of polarity may be neutral and caused by disproportionally high occurrence of polar residues at exposed, least constrained sites. We estimated net evolutionary fluxes of residue polarity and volume at sites with different solvent accessibility in conserved protein families from 12 species of Drosophila. Net loss of polarity, miniscule in magnitude, but consistent across all lineages, occurred at all sites except the most exposed ones, where net flux of polarity was close to zero or, in membrane proteins, even positive. At the intermediate solvent accessibility the net fluxes of polarity and volume were similar to neutral predictions, whereas much of the polarity loss not attributable to neutral expectations occurred at the buried sites. These observations are consistent with the hypothesis that residue composition in many proteins is structurally suboptimal and continues to evolve toward lower polarity in the protein interior, in particular in proteins with intracellular localization. The magnitude of polarity and volume changes was independent from the protein's evolutionary age, indicating that the approach to equilibrium has been slow or that no such single equilibrium exists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.