Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28985229›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

A deep convolutional neural network-based automatic delineation strategy for multiple brain metastases stereotactic radiosurgery.

Yan Liu, Strahinja Stojadinovic, Brian Hrycushko, Zabi Wardak, Steven Lau, Weiguo Lu, Yulong Yan, Steve B Jiang, Xin Zhen, Robert Timmerman and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Deep learning in MRI-guided radiation therapy: A systematic review.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Automatically tracking brain metastases after stereotactic radiosurgery.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Yan LiuSchool of Electrical Engineering and Information, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4881-8429
Strahinja StojadinovicDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America.
Brian HrycushkoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America.
Zabi WardakDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America.
Steven LauDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America.
Weiguo LuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America.
Yulong YanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America.
Steve B JiangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America.
Xin ZhenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America.
Robert TimmermanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America.
Lucien NedziDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America.
Xuejun GuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6725-6906

Funding

NORTH AND CENTRAL TEXAS CTSA FOR PEDIATRIC RESEARCHUL1RR024982 · NCRR · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI TOTO, ROBERT DANIEL · 2007 to 2011
$27.9M
UT Southwestern Center for Translational Medicine (UL1/KL2/TL1)UL1TR001105 · NCATS · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI TOTO, ROBERT DANIEL · 2013 to 2017
$24.5M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate and automatic brain metastases target delineation is a key step for efficient and effective stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) treatment planning. In this work, we developed a deep learning convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithm for segmenting brain metastases on contrast-enhanced T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) datasets. We integrated the CNN-based algorithm into an automatic brain metastases segmentation workflow and validated on both Multimodal Brain Tumor Image Segmentation challenge (BRATS) data and clinical patients' data. Validation on BRATS data yielded average DICE coefficients (DCs) of 0.75±0.07 in the tumor core and 0.81±0.04 in the enhancing tumor, which outperformed most techniques in the 2015 BRATS challenge. Segmentation results of patient cases showed an average of DCs 0.67±0.03 and achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.98±0.01. The developed automatic segmentation strategy surpasses current benchmark levels and offers a promising tool for SRS treatment planning for multiple brain metastases.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerStereotaxic TechniquesAlgorithmsBrainBrain NeoplasmsHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImage Processing, Computer-AssistedRadiosurgery

Identifiers

PMID28985229
PMCPMC5630188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.