Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28985202›Full record

ReviewPediatric research2018

3D bioprinting using stem cells.

Chin Siang Ong, Pooja Yesantharao, Chen Yu Huang, Gunnar Mattson, Joseph Boktor, Takuma Fukunishi, Huaitao Zhang, Narutoshi Hibino

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 113 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
113citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

113 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Smart Bioinks for 4D Bioprinting: Requirements, Design, and Applications.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  3. MXene Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting: Design and Translation.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Nano-Based 3D Printed Scaffold for Bone Tissue Engineering.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Advances in human induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)-based disease modelling in cardiogenetics.Medizinische Genetik : Mitteilungsblatt des Berufsverbandes Medizinische Genetik e.V · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

53 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chin Siang OngDivision of Cardiac Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD.
Pooja YesantharaoDivision of Cardiac Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD.
Chen Yu HuangDivision of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD.
Gunnar MattsonDivision of Cardiac Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD.
Joseph BoktorDivision of Cardiac Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD.
Takuma FukunishiDivision of Cardiac Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD.
Huaitao ZhangDivision of Cardiac Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD.
Narutoshi HibinoDivision of Cardiac Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD.

Funding

Training Program in Cellular and Molecular MedicineT32GM008752 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI RAO, RAJINI · 2000 to 2019
$11.7M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances have allowed for three-dimensional (3D) printing technologies to be applied to biocompatible materials, cells and supporting components, creating a field of 3D bioprinting that holds great promise for artificial organ printing and regenerative medicine. At the same time, stem cells, such as human induced pluripotent stem cells, have driven a paradigm shift in tissue regeneration and the modeling of human disease, and represent an unlimited cell source for tissue regeneration and the study of human disease. The ability to reprogram patient-specific cells holds the promise of an enhanced understanding of disease mechanisms and phenotypic variability. 3D bioprinting has been successfully performed using multiple stem cell types of different lineages and potency. The type of 3D bioprinting employed ranged from microextrusion bioprinting, inkjet bioprinting, laser-assisted bioprinting, to newer technologies such as scaffold-free spheroid-based bioprinting. This review discusses the current advances, applications, limitations and future of 3D bioprinting using stem cells, by organ systems.

Indexed as

Printing, Three-DimensionalAdipose TissueAnimalsArtificial OrgansBiocompatible MaterialsBioprintingBone and BonesCardiovascular SystemHumansHuman Umbilical Vein Endothelial CellsInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsLasersLiverMesenchymal Stem CellsMiceMuscle, SkeletalBiocompatible Materials

Identifiers

PMID28985202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.