Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28985159›Full record

ArticlemAbs2018

International standards for monoclonal antibodies to support pre- and post-marketing product consistency: Evaluation of a candidate international standard for the bioactivities of rituximab.

Sandra Prior, Simon E Hufton, Bernard Fox, Thomas Dougall, Peter Rigsby, Adrian Bristow, participants of the study

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in mAbs, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Path Towards a Tailored Clinical Biosimilar Development.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sandra Priora Molecular Immunology Section, Biotherapeutics Division, National Institute for Biological Standards and Control, South Mimms , Potters Bar , Hertfordshire , United Kingdom.
Simon E Huftona Molecular Immunology Section, Biotherapeutics Division, National Institute for Biological Standards and Control, South Mimms , Potters Bar , Hertfordshire , United Kingdom.
Bernard Foxa Molecular Immunology Section, Biotherapeutics Division, National Institute for Biological Standards and Control, South Mimms , Potters Bar , Hertfordshire , United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6362-5196
Thomas Dougallb Technology Development and Infrastructure Division, National Institute for Biological Standards and Control, South Mimms , Potters Bar , Hertfordshire , United Kingdom.
Peter Rigsbyb Technology Development and Infrastructure Division, National Institute for Biological Standards and Control, South Mimms , Potters Bar , Hertfordshire , United Kingdom.
Adrian Bristowb Technology Development and Infrastructure Division, National Institute for Biological Standards and Control, South Mimms , Potters Bar , Hertfordshire , United Kingdom.
participants of the study

Funding

Department of Health 044/0069
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The intrinsic complexity and heterogeneity of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies is built into the biosimilarity paradigm where critical quality attributes are controlled in exhaustive comparability studies with the reference medicinal product. The long-term success of biosimilars will depend on reassuring healthcare professionals and patients of consistent product quality, safety and efficacy. With this aim, the World Health Organization has endorsed the need for public bioactivity standards for therapeutic monoclonal antibodies in support of current controls. We have developed a candidate international potency standard for rituximab that was evaluated in a multi-center collaborative study using participants' own qualified Fc-effector function and cell-based binding bioassays. Dose-response curve model parameters were shown to reflect similar behavior amongst rituximab preparations, albeit with some differences in potency. In the absence of a common reference standard, potency estimates were in poor agreement amongst laboratories, but the use of the candidate preparation significantly reduced this variability. Our results suggest that the candidate rituximab standard can support bioassay performance and improve data harmonization, which when implemented will promote consistency of rituximab products over their life-cycles. This data provides the first scientific evidence that a classical standardization exercise allowing traceability of bioassay data to an international standard is also applicable to rituximab. However, we submit that this new type of international standard needs to be used appropriately and its role not to be mistaken with that of the reference medicinal product.

Indexed as

Quality ControlRituximabBiological AssayBiosimilar PharmaceuticalsCalibrationDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug DevelopmentDrug StabilityImmunologic FactorsObserver VariationProduct Surveillance, PostmarketingProteolysisReference StandardsReproducibility of ResultsTechnology, PharmaceuticalBiosimilar PharmaceuticalsImmunologic FactorsRituximabADCCbioactivitybioassaybiosimilarsCDCFc-effector functionsinternational standardmonoclonal antibodiesrituximab

Identifiers

PMID28985159
PMCPMC5836816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.