Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28985125›Full record

SynthesisJournal of athletic training2017

Progressive Changes in Walking Kinematics and Kinetics After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury and Reconstruction: A Review and Meta-Analysis.

Lindsay V Slater, Joseph M Hart, Adam R Kelly, Christopher M Kuenze

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of athletic training, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 92 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
92citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

92 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 157 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Peak Vertical Ground Reaction Force Modifies Gait Biomechanics Bilaterally Following ACL Reconstruction: A Randomized Experiment.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2025
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Step-by-step insight into gait analysis: A narrative review unlocking knee biomechanics.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Gait Biomechanical Profiles Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Sexually-Immature Pediatrics.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

32 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lindsay V SlaterDepartment of Kinesiology, The University of Virginia, Charlottesville.
Joseph M HartDepartment of Kinesiology, The University of Virginia, Charlottesville.
Adam R KellyDepartment of Kinesiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing.
Christopher M KuenzeDepartment of Kinesiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing.
Michigan State University · USUniversity of Virginia · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextAnterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and ACL reconstruction (ACLR) result in persistent alterations in lower extremity movement patterns. The progression of lower extremity biomechanics from the time of injury has not been described.

objectiveTo compare the 3-dimensional (3D) lower extremity kinematics and kinetics of walking among individuals with ACL deficiency (ACLD), individuals with ACLR, and healthy control participants from 3 to 64 months after ACLR. DATA SOURCES: We searched PubMed and Web of Science from 1970 through 2013. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: We selected only articles that provided peak kinematic and kinetic values during walking in individuals with ACLD or ACLR and comparison with a healthy control group or the contralateral uninjured limb. DATA SYNTHESIS: A total of 27 of 511 identified studies were included. Weighted means, pooled standard deviations, and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for the healthy control, ACLD, and ACLR groups at each reported time since surgery. The magnitude of between-groups (ACLR versus ACLD, control, or contralateral limb) differences at each time point was evaluated using Cohen d effect sizes and associated 95% confidence intervals. Peak knee-flexion angle (Cohen d = -0.41) and external knee-extensor moment (Cohen d = -0.68) were smaller in the ACLD than in the healthy control group. Peak knee-flexion angle (Cohen d range = -0.78 to -1.23) and external knee-extensor moment (Cohen d range = -1.39 to -2.16) were smaller in the ACLR group from 10 to 40 months after ACLR. Reductions in external knee-adduction moment (Cohen d range = -0.50 to -1.23) were present from 9 to 42 months after ACLR.

conclusionsReductions in peak knee-flexion angle, external knee-flexion moment, and external knee-adduction moment were present in the ACLD and ACLR groups. This movement profile during the loading phase of gait has been linked to knee-cartilage degeneration and may contribute to the development of osteoarthritis after ACLR.

Indexed as

Anterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionAdultAnterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleGaitHumansJoint InstabilityKineticsKnee JointLower ExtremityMaleMovementWalkingWalking Speedanterior cruciate ligament deficiencygait biomechanicsknee osteoarthritismovement dysfunction

Identifiers

PMID28985125
PMCPMC5634233
OpenAlexW2745179425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.