ArticleMedical education2018
Lessons learned from 15 years of non-grades-based selection for medical school.
Article in Medical education, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Student background, admission routes, and academic success: a structural mediation analysis.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Professional Identity Formation - important, complex, and dynamic.GMS journal for medical education · 2026Article
- Improving selection procedures in health professions education from the applicant perspective: an interview study.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Does medical education reform change who is selected? A national cross-sectional survey from China.BMJ open · 2023Article
- The association between how medical students were selected and their perceived stress levels in Year-1 of medical school.BMC medical education · 2023Article
- The added value of free preparatory activities for widening access to medical education: a multi-cohort study.BMC medical education · 2023Article
- Applicant perceptions of selection methods for health professions education: Rationales and subgroup differences.Medical education · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
- Medical empathy in medical students in Madrid: A proposal for empathy level cut-off points for Spain.PloS one · 2022Article
- Effects of raising the bar on medical student study progress: An intersectional approach.Medical education · 2021Article
- Unraveling the medical residency selection game.Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice · 2021Article
- University Admission Test Associates with Academic Performance at the End of Medical Course in a PBL Medical Hybrid Curriculum.Advances in medical education and practice · 2020Article
- Bachelor completion and dropout rates of selected, rejected and lottery-admitted medical students in the Netherlands.BMC medical education · 2019Article
- Evaluation of critical thinking course for premedical students using literature and film.Korean journal of medical education · 2019Article
- Who is allowed to study medicine? - regulations and evidence.GMS journal for medical education · 2019Article
- Does selection pay off? A cost-benefit comparison of medical school selection and lottery systems.Medical education · 2018Article
- Selection and lottery in medical school admissions: who gains and who loses?MedEdPublish (2016) · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
contextThirty years ago, it was suggested in the Edinburgh Declaration that medical school applicants should be selected not only on academic, but also on non-academic, attributes. The main rationale behind extending medical school selection procedures with the evaluation of (non-academic) personal qualities is that this will lead to the selection of students who will perform better as a doctor than those who are selected on the basis of academic measures only. A second rationale is the expectation that this will lead to a representative health workforce as a result of reduced adverse impact. The aims of this paper are (i) to describe what can be learned about the use of selection criteria other than grades from over 15 years of Dutch experience and (ii) to summarise current knowledge on the issue of adverse impact in relation to non-grades-based selection.
methodsA narrative review was undertaken of the (published) evidence that has resulted from non-grades-based school-specific selection procedures in the Netherlands and from recent explorations of the effect of the use of non-grades-based selection criteria on student diversity.
resultsThe Dutch evidence is grouped into five key themes: the effect of participation in voluntary selection procedures, the assessment of pre-university extracurricular activities, the use of work samples, Dutch experiences with situational judgement tests and the effects of changing circumstances. This is followed by several lessons learned for medical schools that aim to increase their student diversity.
conclusionOver the last 30 years, important steps towards reliable and valid methods for measuring non-academic abilities have been taken. The current paper describes several lessons that can be learned from the steps taken in the Dutch context. The importance of sharing evidence gathered around the globe and building on this evidence to reach our goal of predicting who will be a good doctor is acknowledged.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.