Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28984301›Full record

ArticleModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2018

Are the uterine serous carcinomas underdiagnosed? Histomorphologic and immunohistochemical correlates and clinical follow up in high-grade endometrial carcinomas initially diagnosed as high-grade endometrioid carcinoma.

Shaomin Hu, Jeff L Hinson, Rahul Matnani, Michael L Cibull, Rouzan G Karabakhtsian

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Critical analysis of the FIGO 2018 cervical cancer stagingJournal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Impact of TP53 immunohistochemistry on the histological grading system for endometrial endometrioid carcinoma.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shaomin HuDepartment of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7900-8205
Jeff L HinsonDepartment of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Chandler Hospital, University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.
Rahul MatnaniDepartment of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Chandler Hospital, University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.
Michael L CibullDepartment of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Chandler Hospital, University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.
Rouzan G KarabakhtsianDepartment of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA.
Albert B. Chandler Hospital · USAlbert Einstein College of Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Histologic subclassification of high-grade endometrial carcinomas can sometimes be a diagnostic challenge when based on histomorphology alone. Here we utilized immunohistochemical markers to determine the immunophenotype in histologically ambiguous high-grade endometrial carcinomas that were initially diagnosed as pure or mixed high-grade endometrioid carcinoma, aiming to determine the utility of selected immunohistochemical panel in accurate classification of these distinct tumor types, while correlating these findings with the clinical outcome. A total of 43 high-grade endometrial carcinoma cases initially classified as pure high-grade endometrioid carcinoma (n=32), mixed high-grade endometrioid carcinoma/serous carcinoma (n=9) and mixed high-grade endometrioid carcinoma/clear cell carcinoma (n=2) were retrospectively stained with a panel of immunostains, including antibodies for p53, p16, estrogen receptor, and mammaglobin. Clinical follow-up data were obtained, and stage-to-stage disease outcomes were compared for different tumor types. Based on aberrant staining for p53 and p16, 17/43 (40%) of the high-grade endometrial carcinoma cases initially diagnosed as high-grade endometrioid carcinoma were re-classified as serous carcinoma. All 17 cases showed negative staining for mammaglobin, while estrogen receptor was positive in only 6 (35%) cases. The remaining 26 cases of high-grade endometrioid carcinoma showed wild-type staining for p53 in 25 (96%) cases, patchy staining for p16 in 20 (77%) cases, and were positive for mammaglobin and estrogen receptor in 8 (31%) and 19 (73%) cases, respectively, thus the initial diagnosis of high-grade endometrioid carcinoma was confirmed in these cases. In addition, the patients with re-classified serous carcinoma had advanced clinical stages at diagnosis and poorer overall survival on clinical follow-up compared to that of the remaining 26 high-grade endometrioid carcinoma cases. These results indicate that selected immunohistochemical panel, including p53, p16, and mammaglobin can be helpful in reaching accurate diagnosis in cases of histomorphologically ambiguous endometrial carcinomas, and can assist in providing guidance for appropriate therapeutic options for the patients.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, EndometrioidCystadenocarcinoma, SerousDiagnosis, DifferentialDiagnostic ErrorsEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansImmunohistochemistryMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingUterine NeoplasmsBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID28984301
OpenAlexW2763649715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.