Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28984193›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2017

DRREP: deep ridge regressed epitope predictor.

Gene Sher, Degui Zhi, Shaojie Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Multi-perspectives and challenges in identifying B-cell epitopes.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2023
    Review
  6. Review
  7. B-Cell Epitope Predictions Using Computational Methods.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. A Review of Deep Learning Methods for Antibodies.Antibodies (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gene SherDepartment of Computer Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA. gsher@knights.ucf.edu.
Degui ZhiSchool of Biomedical Informatics, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Shaojie ZhangDepartment of Computer Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA.

Funding

Next-Generation Bioinformatics for Next-Generation SequencingR01HG008115 · NHGRI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI YU, FULI, ZHANG, KUI · 2014 to 2016
$1.4M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG008115
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe ability to predict epitopes plays an enormous role in vaccine development in terms of our ability to zero in on where to do a more thorough in-vivo analysis of the protein in question. Though for the past decade there have been numerous advancements and improvements in epitope prediction, on average the best benchmark prediction accuracies are still only around 60%. New machine learning algorithms have arisen within the domain of deep learning, text mining, and convolutional networks. This paper presents a novel analytically trained and string kernel using deep neural network, which is tailored for continuous epitope prediction, called: Deep Ridge Regressed Epitope Predictor (DRREP).

resultsDRREP was tested on long protein sequences from the following datasets: SARS, Pellequer, HIV, AntiJen, and SEQ194. DRREP was compared to numerous state of the art epitope predictors, including the most recently published predictors called LBtope and DMNLBE. Using area under ROC curve (AUC), DRREP achieved a performance improvement over the best performing predictors on SARS (13.7%), HIV (8.9%), Pellequer (1.5%), and SEQ194 (3.1%), with its performance being matched only on the AntiJen dataset, by the LBtope predictor, where both DRREP and LBtope achieved an AUC of 0.702.

conclusionDRREP is an analytically trained deep neural network, thus capable of learning in a single step through regression. By combining the features of deep learning, string kernels, and convolutional networks, the system is able to perform residue-by-residue prediction of continues epitopes with higher accuracy than the current state of the art predictors.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerAmino Acid SequenceComputational BiologyEpitopes, B-LymphocyteEpitopes, B-LymphocyteAnalytical learningContinuous epitopeConvolutional networkDeep networkEpitope predictionLinear epitopeNeural networkString kernel

Identifiers

PMID28984193
PMCPMC5629616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.