Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28983822›Full record

ArticleFolia microbiologica2018

In vitro activity of micafungin against biofilms of Candida albicans, Candida glabrata, and Candida parapsilosis at different stages of maturation.

Małgorzata Prażyńska, Tomasz Bogiel, Eugenia Gospodarek-Komkowska

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Folia microbiologica, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Lack of efficacy of echinocandins against high metabolic activity biofilms of Candida parapsilosis clinical isolates.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Małgorzata PrażyńskaDepartment of Microbiology, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, 9 Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej Street, 85-094, Bydgoszcz, Poland. malgorzata_szabelska@wp.pl.
Tomasz BogielDepartment of Microbiology, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, 9 Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej Street, 85-094, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Eugenia Gospodarek-KomkowskaDepartment of Microbiology, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, 9 Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej Street, 85-094, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz · PLNicolaus Copernicus University · PL

Funding

Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz DS-UPB no. 933Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz Rector's Grant Number 06/CM
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Candida spp. is able to form a biofilm, which is considered resistant to the majority of antifungals used in medicine. The aim of this study was to evaluate the in vitro activity of micafungin against Candida spp. biofilms at different stages of their maturation (2, 6, and 24 h). We assessed the inhibitory effect of micafungin against 78 clinical isolates of Candida spp., growing as planktonic or sessile cells, by widely recommended broth microdilution method. The in vitro effect on sessile cells viability was evaluated by colorimetric reduction assay. All examined strains were susceptible or intermediate to micafungin when growing as planktonic cells. At the early stages of biofilm maturation, from 11 (39.3%) to 20 (100%), tested strains, depending on the species, exhibited sessile minimal inhibitory concentrations (SMICs) of micafungin at ≤ 2 mg/L. For 24-h-old Candida spp. biofilms, from 3 (10.7%) to 20 (100%) of the tested strains displayed SMICs of micafungin at ≤ 2 mg/L. Our findings confirm that micafungin exhibits high potential anti-Candida-biofilm activity. However, this effect does not comprise all Candida species and strains. All strains were susceptible or intermediate to micafungin when growing as planktonic cells, but for biofilms, micafungin displays species- and strain-specific activity. Paradoxical growth of C. albicans and C. parapsilosis was observed. Antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida spp. biofilms would be the best solution, but to date, no reference method is available. The strongest antibiofilm activity of micafungin is observed at early stages of biofilm formation. Possibly, micafungin could be considered as an effective agent for prevention of biofilm-associated candidiasis, especially catheter-related candidaemia.

Indexed as

Antifungal AgentsBiofilmsCandida albicansCandida glabrataCandida parapsilosisCandidiasisEchinocandinsHumansLipopeptidesMicafunginMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAntifungal AgentsEchinocandinsLipopeptidesMicafunginAntifungal drugsCandidiasisEchinocandinParadoxical growthSessile cells

Identifiers

PMID28983822
OpenAlexW2764223866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.