Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28983791›Full record

ArticleJournal of youth and adolescence2018

Co-Brooding and Co-Reflection as Differential Predictors of Depressive Symptoms and Friendship Quality in Adolescents: Investigating the Moderating Role of Gender.

Margot Bastin, Janne Vanhalst, Filip Raes, Patricia Bijttebier

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of youth and adolescence, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Margot BastinSchool Psychology and Development in Context, KU Leuven, Tiensestraat 102, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium. Margot.Bastin@kuleuven.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5434-2132
Janne VanhalstSchool Psychology and Development in Context, KU Leuven, Tiensestraat 102, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Filip RaesCentre for Psychology of Learning and Experimental Psychopathology, KU Leuven, Tiensestraat 102, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Patricia BijttebierSchool Psychology and Development in Context, KU Leuven, Tiensestraat 102, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Co-rumination has been shown advantageous for friendship quality, but disadvantageous for mental health. Recently, two components have been distinguished, with co-brooding predicting increases in depressive symptoms and co-reflection decreases. The current study aimed to replicate these findings and investigated whether both components also show differential relations with friendship quality. Gender was investigated as a moderator. Path analyses were used on data of 313 adolescents aged 9-17 (50.5% girls). Co-brooding was related to more concurrent and prospective depressive symptoms in girls. Co-reflection predicted less concurrent and prospective depressive symptoms in girls and higher concurrent positive friendship quality for boys and girls. This study underscores the value of studying co-rumination components and suggests that boys and girls in this context differ in their pathways towards depression.

Indexed as

Interpersonal RelationsOptimismPessimismThinkingAdolescentChildCross-Sectional StudiesDepressionFemaleFriendsHumansMaleProspective StudiesSelf ReportSex FactorsAdolescenceCo-broodingCo-reflectionCo-ruminationDepressive symptomsFriendship quality

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.