Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28983697›Full record

ReviewPediatric surgery international2017

Screening for biliary atresia.

Akira Matsui

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric surgery international, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Efficacy and safety of post-Kasai steroid-based protocol in biliary atresia.Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition · 2026
    Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. BioMed research international · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Akira MatsuiGraduate School of Nursing Science, St. Luke's International University, 3-8-5 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan. matsui-a@ncchd.go.jp.
St. Luke's International University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early diagnosis followed by proper KP is essential for the improvement of long-term prognosis for patients with BA. It is increasingly accepted that KP at ≤ 30 days of age significantly improves native liver survival rate. Published analyses in English and Japanese indicate that screening by SCC and DB/CB is potentially feasible. Screening with SCC has been implemented in Tochigi Prefecture, Japan, since 1994. The concept of SCC was introduced from Japan to Taiwan and resulted in nationwide screening with SCC for the first time in Taiwan in 2004, followed by Japan in 2012. Home-based screening using SCC is easy and cost-effective; however, it may cause some difficulties for families in case of stools with intermediate colors. Laboratory-based screening using DB/CB may detect the suspected cases earlier, resulting in an increase in the number of patients with BA who undergo KP at ≤ 30 days of age; however, the recall rate is 1% and may be beyond an acceptable range. Further studies are needed to assess the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of both home-based (SCC) and laboratory-based (DB/CB) screening for BA.

Indexed as

Early DiagnosisBiliary AtresiaGlobal HealthHumansInfant, NewbornMass ScreeningMorbiditySurvival RateBile acidBiliary atresiaConjugated bilirubinDirect bilirubinNative liver survivalPositive predictive valueScreeningSensitivitySpecificityStool color card

Identifiers

PMID28983697
OpenAlexW2762656970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.