Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28983686›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2018

8β-OH-THC and 8β,11-diOH-THC-minor metabolites with major informative value?

Angela Gasse, Heidi Pfeiffer, Helga Köhler, Jennifer Schürenkamp

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. In Vitro Metabolism of ΔDrug testing and analysis · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Toxicogenetic analysis of Δ9-THC-metabolizing enzymes.International journal of legal medicine · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Angela GasseInstitute of Legal Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Röntgenstr. 23, 48149, Münster, Germany. angela.gasse@uni-muenster.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8876-7657
Heidi PfeifferInstitute of Legal Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Röntgenstr. 23, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Helga KöhlerInstitute of Legal Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Röntgenstr. 23, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Jennifer SchürenkampInstitute of Legal Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Röntgenstr. 23, 48149, Münster, Germany.
University Hospital Münster · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) metabolites 8β-hydroxy-THC and 8β,11-dihydroxy-THC are mentioned in the literature as potential blood markers of recent cannabis use. However, the formation of these metabolites in in vivo detectable concentrations has been described controversially. Therefore, the aim of this study was to verify the in vivo metabolism of 8β-hydroxy-THC and 8β,11-dihydroxy-THC in order to evaluate their potential as blood markers of recent cannabis use. First, we developed and validated a solid-phase-extraction method coupled with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry in order to enable the selective and very sensitive determination of 8β-hydroxy-THC and 8β,11-dihydroxy-THC. The application of this method in the analysis of 70 authentic plasma samples of cannabis users revealed positive results for both analytes. We detected 8β-hydroxy-THC in three and 8β,11-dihydroxy-THC in 37 out of the 70 analyzed samples. For 8β-hydroxy-THC, all of the three positive results were below the limit of quantification (LOQ; 0.3 ng/mL) but above the limit of detection (LOD; 0.2 ng/mL). For 8β,11-dihydroxy-THC, only two positive results were below the LOQ (0.4 ng/mL) but above the LOD (0.3 ng/mL); the remaining 35 were quantified. Hence, we were able to prove the in vivo metabolism from THC to both 8β-hydroxy-THC and 8β,11-dihydroxy-THC in detectable concentrations. The quantitative comparison of 8β-hydroxy-THC and 8β,11-dihydroxy-THC with the main cannabinoids THC, 11-hydroxy-THC, and 11-nor-9-carboxy-THC revealed no further informative value for 8β-hydroxy-THC regarding the last time of cannabis consumption. However, the detectability from 8β,11-dihydroxy-THC compared to 11-hydroxy-THC suggests a shorter detection time for 8β,11-dihydroxy-THC and thereby a promising application of this metabolite as a blood marker of recent cannabis use.

Indexed as

BiomarkersDronabinolForensic ToxicologyGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryHallucinogensHumansLimit of DetectionMarijuana UseSolid Phase ExtractionBiomarkersDronabinolHallucinogens8β,11-diOH-THC8β-OH-THCBlood markersRecent cannabis consumption

Identifiers

PMID28983686
OpenAlexW2761166849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.