Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28983579›Full record

ArticleSingapore medical journal2018

Cost-effectiveness of two-dose human papillomavirus vaccination in Singapore.

Sun Kuie Tay, Bee-Wah Lee, Woo Yun Sohn, I-Heng Lee, Gaurav Mathur, Melvin Sanicas, Georges Van Kriekinge

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Singapore medical journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sun Kuie TayDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Bee-Wah LeeDepartment of Paediatrics, NUS Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Woo Yun SohnMedical Affairs, GSK, Singapore.
I-Heng LeeHealth Economics, GSK, Singapore.
Gaurav MathurMedical Affairs, Singapore.
Melvin SanicasMedical Affairs, Singapore.
Georges Van KriekingeHealth Economics, GSK, Wavre, Belgium.
GlaxoSmithKline (Belgium) · BEMinistry of Health · SGNational University of Singapore · SGSingapore General Hospital · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCervical cancer is the tenth most common cancer and the eighth most frequent cause of death among women in Singapore. As human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is the necessary cause of cervical cancer, the risk of cervical cancer can be substantially reduced through vaccination. This study was conducted to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of two-dose HPV vaccination as part of a national vaccination programme for 12-year-old girls in Singapore, from the perspective of the healthcare payer.

methodsA lifetime Markov cohort model was used to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of introducing the AS04-adjuvanted HPV-16/18 vaccine (AS04-HPV-16/18v) to the current cervical screening programme in Singapore. Furthermore, the cost-effectiveness of the AS04-HPV-16/18v was compared with the HPV-6/11/16/18 vaccine (4vHPV). Model inputs were derived from local data, where possible, and validated by clinical experts in Singapore.

resultsIntroduction of the AS04-HPV-16/18v in Singapore was shown to prevent 137 cervical cancer cases and 48 cervical cancer deaths when compared with screening alone. This resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of SGD 12,645 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained, which is cost-effective according to the World Health Organization threshold for Singapore. When discounted at 3%, AS04-HPV-16/18v was dominant over 4vHPV, with cost savings of SGD 80,559 and 28 additional QALYs gained. In the one-way sensitivity analysis, AS04-HPV-16/18v remained cost-effective compared with screening alone and dominant compared with 4vHPV.

conclusionAS04-HPV-16/18v is the most cost-effective choice for reducing the burden of cervical cancer through universal mass vaccination for 12-year-old girls in Singapore.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisAdjuvants, ImmunologicChildCohort StudiesFemaleHealth Care CostsHuman papillomavirus 16Human papillomavirus 18HumansMarkov ChainsModels, StatisticalPapillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesPrevalenceProbabilityQuality-Adjusted Life YearsAdjuvants, ImmunologicPapillomavirus Vaccinescancer controlcervical cancerHPV vaccinenational vaccination programmePap smear

Identifiers

PMID28983579
PMCPMC6056373
OpenAlexW2763412677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.