Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28983555›Full record

ArticleJAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery2017

Measuring Institutional Quality in Head and Neck Surgery Using Hospital-Level Data: Negative Margin Rates and Neck Dissection Yield.

David W Schoppy, Kim F Rhoads, Yifei Ma, Michelle M Chen, Brian Nussenbaum, Ryan K Orosco, Eben L Rosenthal, Vasu Divi

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Delays Starting Postoperative Radiotherapy Among Head and Neck Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Quantitative pathological lymph node parameters in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a comprehensive analysis of complementary prognostic value in clinically relevant subgroups.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Head and neck cancers: Monitoring quality and reporting outcomes.Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology · 2022
    Article
  11. CT for estimating adequacy of lymph node dissection in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2021
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Robotic surgery of head and neck cancers, a narrative review.European journal of translational myology · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Management of the Neck in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Oral Cavity and Oropharynx: ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

David W SchoppyDivision of Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Palo Alto, California.
Kim F RhoadsMotility Doc, San Jose, California.
Yifei MaDivision of Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Palo Alto, California.
Michelle M ChenDivision of Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Palo Alto, California.
Brian NussenbaumDivision of Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.
Ryan K OroscoDivision of Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Palo Alto, California.
Eben L RosenthalDivision of Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Palo Alto, California.
Vasu DiviDivision of Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Palo Alto, California.
Stanford University · USMotility (United States) · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Negative margins and lymph node yields (LNY) of 18 or more from neck dissections in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) have been associated with improved patient survival. It is unclear whether these metrics can be used to identify hospitals with improved outcomes. Objective: To determine whether 2 patient-level metrics would predict outcomes at the hospital level. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective review of records from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) was used to identify patients who underwent primary surgery and concurrent neck dissection for HNSCC between 2004 and 2013. The percentage of patients at each hospital with negative margins on primary resection and an LNY 18 or more from a neck dissection was quantified. Cox proportional hazard models were used to define the association between hospital performance on these metrics and overall survival. Main Outcomes and Measures: Margin status and lymph node yield at hospital level. Overall survival (OS). Results: We identified 1008 hospitals in the NCDB where 64 738 patients met inclusion criteria. Of the 64 738 participants, 45 170 (69.8%) were men and 19 568 (30.2%) were women. The mean SD age of included patients was 60.5 (12.0) years. Patients treated at hospitals attaining the combined metric of a 90% or higher negative margin rate and 80% or more of cases with LNYs of 18 or more experienced a significant reduction in mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 0.93; 95% CI, 0.89-0.98). This benefit in survival was independent of the patient-level improvement associated with negative margins (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.71-0.76) and LNY of 18 or more (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.83-0.88). Including these metrics in the model neutralized the association of traditional measures of hospital quality (volume and teaching status). Conclusions and Relevance: Treatment at hospitals that attain a high rate of negative margins and LNY of 18 or more is associated with improved survival in patients undergoing surgery for HNSCC. These surgical outcome measures predicted outcomes independent of traditional, but generally nonmodifiable characteristics. Tracking of these metrics may help identify high-quality centers and provide guidance for institution-level quality improvement.

Indexed as

Neck DissectionQuality Indicators, Health CareFemaleHead and Neck NeoplasmsHospitalsHumansLymph Node ExcisionMaleMargins of ExcisionMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesSurvival Rate

Identifiers

PMID28983555
PMCPMC5710350
OpenAlexW2764125972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.