Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28983528›Full record

ArticleACS omega2017

Toxicant Formation in Dabbing: The Terpene Story.

Jiries Meehan-Atrash, Wentai Luo, Robert M Strongin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Cannabis concentrate vaping chemistry.Frontiers in toxicology · 2025
    Review
  3. Toxicity of waterpipe tobacco smoking: the role of flavors, sweeteners, humectants, and charcoal.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Analgesic Potential of Terpenes Derived fromPharmacological reviews · 2021
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jiries Meehan-AtrashDepartment of Chemistry, Portland State University, 1719 SW 10th Avenue, Portland, Oregon 97201, United States.
Wentai LuoDepartment of Chemistry, Portland State University, 1719 SW 10th Avenue, Portland, Oregon 97201, United States.
Robert M StronginDepartment of Chemistry, Portland State University, 1719 SW 10th Avenue, Portland, Oregon 97201, United States.

Funding

Toxicant Production and Mitigation in the Electronic-Cigarette Reaction VesselR01ES025257 · NIEHS · PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY · PI STRONGIN, ROBERT M · 2015 to 2019
$3.6M
NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES025257
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inhalable, noncombustible cannabis products are playing a central role in the expansion of the medical and recreational use of cannabis. In particular, the practice of "dabbing" with butane hash oil has emerged with great popularity in states that have legalized cannabis. Despite their growing popularity, the degradation product profiles of these new products have not been extensively investigated. The study herein focuses on the chemistry of myrcene and other common terpenes found in cannabis extracts. Methacrolein, benzene, and several other products of concern to human health were formed under the conditions that simulated real-world dabbing. The terpene degradation products observed are consistent with those reported in the atmospheric chemistry literature.

Identifiers

PMID28983528
PMCPMC5623941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.