ArticleFrontiers in plant science2017
Genomic Prediction of Sunflower Hybrids Oil Content.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.
- Improving hybrid breeding efficiency in winter oilseed rape under sparse multi-environment testing.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026Article
- Accelerating genetic gain through integrated genomic selection in crop plants.Journal of applied genetics · 2026Review
- Prediction of oil yield in sunflower using deep learning regression algorithm under normal and drought stress conditions.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Review
- One Hundred Years of Progress and Pitfalls: Maximising Heterosis through Increasing Multi-Locus Nuclear Heterozygosity.Biology · 2024Review
- Maximizing efficiency in sunflower breeding through historical data optimization.Plant methods · 2024Article
- Article
- Oil yield prediction for sunflower hybrid selection using different machine learning algorithms.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Review
- Review
- Integrated omics approaches for flax improvement under abiotic and biotic stress: Current status and future prospects.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Review
- Genomic Selection: A Tool for Accelerating the Efficiency of Molecular Breeding for Development of Climate-Resilient Crops.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Review
- Assessing combining abilities, genomic data, and genotype × environment interactions to predict hybrid grain sorghum performance.The plant genome · 2021Article
- Genotyping and lipid profiling of 601 cultivated sunflower lines reveals novel genetic determinants of oil fatty acid content.BMC genomics · 2021Article
- Multi-omics-based prediction of hybrid performance in canola.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2021Article
- Training Set Optimization for Sparse Phenotyping in Genomic Selection: A Conceptual Overview.Frontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- Revisiting hybrid breeding designs using genomic predictions: simulations highlight the superiority of incomplete factorials between segregating families over topcross designs.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2020Article
- Hybrid Breeding for MLN Resistance: Heterosis, Combining Ability, and Hybrid Prediction.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Edible Plant Oil: Global Status, Health Issues, and Perspectives.Frontiers in plant science · 2020Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prediction of hybrid performance using incomplete factorial mating designs is widely used in breeding programs including different heterotic groups. Based on the general combining ability (GCA) of the parents, predictions are accurate only if the genetic variance resulting from the specific combining ability is small and both parents have phenotyped descendants. Genomic selection (GS) can predict performance using a model trained on both phenotyped and genotyped hybrids that do not necessarily include all hybrid parents. Therefore, GS could overcome the issue of unknown parent GCA. Here, we compared the accuracy of classical GCA-based and genomic predictions for oil content of sunflower seeds using several GS models. Our study involved 452 sunflower hybrids from an incomplete factorial design of 36 female and 36 male lines. Re-sequencing of parental lines allowed to identify 468,194 non-redundant SNPs and to infer the hybrid genotypes. Oil content was observed in a multi-environment trial (MET) over 3 years, leading to nine different environments. We compared GCA-based model to different GS models including female and male genomic kinships with the addition of the female-by-male interaction genomic kinship, the use of functional knowledge as SNPs in genes of oil metabolic pathways, and with epistasis modeling. When both parents have descendants in the training set, the predictive ability was high even for GCA-based prediction, with an average MET value of 0.782. GS performed slightly better (+0.2%). Neither the inclusion of the female-by-male interaction, nor functional knowledge of oil metabolism, nor epistasis modeling improved the GS accuracy. GS greatly improved predictive ability when one or both parents were untested in the training set, increasing GCA-based predictive ability by 10.4% from 0.575 to 0.635 in the MET. In this scenario, performing GS only considering SNPs in oil metabolic pathways did not improve whole genome GS prediction but increased GCA-based prediction ability by 6.4%. Our results show that GS is a major improvement to breeding efficiency compared to the classical GCA modeling when either one or both parents are not well-characterized. This finding could therefore accelerate breeding through reducing phenotyping efforts and more effectively targeting for the most promising crosses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.