Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28983306›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2017

Genomic Prediction of Sunflower Hybrids Oil Content.

Brigitte Mangin, Fanny Bonnafous, Nicolas Blanchet, Marie-Claude Boniface, Emmanuelle Bret-Mestries, Sébastien Carrère, Ludovic Cottret, Ludovic Legrand, Gwenola Marage, Prune Pegot-Espagnet and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Improving hybrid breeding efficiency in winter oilseed rape under sparse multi-environment testing.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Multi-omics-based prediction of hybrid performance in canola.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Brigitte ManginLIPM, Université de Toulouse, INRA, Centre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueCastanet-Tolosan, France.
Fanny BonnafousLIPM, Université de Toulouse, INRA, Centre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueCastanet-Tolosan, France.
Nicolas BlanchetLIPM, Université de Toulouse, INRA, Centre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueCastanet-Tolosan, France.
Marie-Claude BonifaceLIPM, Université de Toulouse, INRA, Centre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueCastanet-Tolosan, France.
Emmanuelle Bret-MestriesTerres Inovia, AGIRCastanet-Tolosan, France.
Sébastien CarrèreLIPM, Université de Toulouse, INRA, Centre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueCastanet-Tolosan, France.
Ludovic CottretLIPM, Université de Toulouse, INRA, Centre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueCastanet-Tolosan, France.
Ludovic LegrandLIPM, Université de Toulouse, INRA, Centre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueCastanet-Tolosan, France.
Gwenola MarageLIPM, Université de Toulouse, INRA, Centre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueCastanet-Tolosan, France.
Prune Pegot-EspagnetLIPM, Université de Toulouse, INRA, Centre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueCastanet-Tolosan, France.
Stéphane MunosLIPM, Université de Toulouse, INRA, Centre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueCastanet-Tolosan, France.
Nicolas PouillyLIPM, Université de Toulouse, INRA, Centre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueCastanet-Tolosan, France.
Felicity VearGDEC, INRA, Université Clermont II Blaise PascalClermont-Ferrand, France.
Patrick VincourtLIPM, Université de Toulouse, INRA, Centre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueCastanet-Tolosan, France.
Nicolas B LangladeLIPM, Université de Toulouse, INRA, Centre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueCastanet-Tolosan, France.
Laboratoire des Interactions Plantes Micro-Organismes · FRTerres Univia · FRUniversité Clermont Auvergne · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prediction of hybrid performance using incomplete factorial mating designs is widely used in breeding programs including different heterotic groups. Based on the general combining ability (GCA) of the parents, predictions are accurate only if the genetic variance resulting from the specific combining ability is small and both parents have phenotyped descendants. Genomic selection (GS) can predict performance using a model trained on both phenotyped and genotyped hybrids that do not necessarily include all hybrid parents. Therefore, GS could overcome the issue of unknown parent GCA. Here, we compared the accuracy of classical GCA-based and genomic predictions for oil content of sunflower seeds using several GS models. Our study involved 452 sunflower hybrids from an incomplete factorial design of 36 female and 36 male lines. Re-sequencing of parental lines allowed to identify 468,194 non-redundant SNPs and to infer the hybrid genotypes. Oil content was observed in a multi-environment trial (MET) over 3 years, leading to nine different environments. We compared GCA-based model to different GS models including female and male genomic kinships with the addition of the female-by-male interaction genomic kinship, the use of functional knowledge as SNPs in genes of oil metabolic pathways, and with epistasis modeling. When both parents have descendants in the training set, the predictive ability was high even for GCA-based prediction, with an average MET value of 0.782. GS performed slightly better (+0.2%). Neither the inclusion of the female-by-male interaction, nor functional knowledge of oil metabolism, nor epistasis modeling improved the GS accuracy. GS greatly improved predictive ability when one or both parents were untested in the training set, increasing GCA-based predictive ability by 10.4% from 0.575 to 0.635 in the MET. In this scenario, performing GS only considering SNPs in oil metabolic pathways did not improve whole genome GS prediction but increased GCA-based prediction ability by 6.4%. Our results show that GS is a major improvement to breeding efficiency compared to the classical GCA modeling when either one or both parents are not well-characterized. This finding could therefore accelerate breeding through reducing phenotyping efforts and more effectively targeting for the most promising crosses.

Indexed as

factorial designGBSgenomic selectionhybridoil contentsunflower

Identifiers

PMID28983306
PMCPMC5613134
OpenAlexW2758660848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.