ArticleInternational journal of solids and structures2017
Computational Modeling of Interfacial Behaviors in Nanocomposite Materials.
Article in International journal of solids and structures, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Finite Element Analysis of Crack Propagation in Adhesive Joints with Notched Adherends.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Numerical investigation of the role of intercellular interactions on collective epithelial cell migration.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Towards understanding the bulk material response in nanocomposites, an interfacial zone model was proposed to define a variety of material interface behaviors (e.g. brittle, ductile, rubber-like, elastic-perfectly plastic behavior etc.). It also has the capability to predict bulk material response though independently control of the interface properties (e.g. stiffness, strength, toughness). The mechanical response of granular nanocomposite (i.e. nacre) was investigated through modeling the "relatively soft" organic interface as an interfacial zone among "hard" mineral tablets and simulation results were compared with experimental measurements of stress-strain curves in tension and compression tests. Through modeling varies material interfaces, we found out that the bulk material response of granular nanocomposite was regulated by the interfacial behaviors. This interfacial zone model provides a possible numerical tool for qualitatively understanding of structure-property relationships through material interface design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.