Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28983116›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

A method for mapping and quantifying whole organ diffusion-weighted image distortion in MR imaging of the prostate.

Andrew B Gill, Marcin Czarniecki, Ferdia A Gallagher, Tristan Barrett

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew B GillDepartment of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. abg28@cam.ac.uk.
Marcin CzarnieckiDepartment of Radiology, Masovian Brodno Hospital, Warsaw, Poland.
Ferdia A GallagherDepartment of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Tristan BarrettDepartment of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
University of Cambridge · GBAddenbrooke's Hospital · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 16465Cancer Research UK 16628
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A computational algorithm was designed to produce a measure of DW image distortion across the prostate. This algorithm was tested and validated on virtual phantoms incorporating known degrees and distributions of distortion. A study was then carried out on DW image volumes from three sets of 10 patients who had been imaged previously. These volumes had been radiologically assessed to have, respectively, 'no distortion' or 'significant distortion' or the potential for 'significant distortion' due to susceptibility effects from hip prostheses. Prostate outlines were drawn on a T2-weighted (T2W) image 'gold-standard' volume and on an ADC image volume derived from DW images acquired over the same region. The algorithm was then applied to these outlines to quantify and map image distortion. The proposed method correctly reproduced known distortion values and distributions in virtual phantoms. It also successfully distinguished between the three groups of patients: mean distortion in 'non-distorted' image volumes, 1.942 ± 0.582 mm; 'distorted', 4.402 ± 1.098 mm; and 'hip patients' 8.083 ± 4.653 mm; P < 0.001. This work has demonstrated and validated a means of quantifying and mapping image distortion in clinical prostate MRI cases.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsArtifactsDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingHumansMalePhantoms, ImagingProstateProstatic NeoplasmsRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted

Identifiers

PMID28983116
PMCPMC5629196
OpenAlexW2758316471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.