Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28982973›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2017

Metabolomic analysis of insulin resistance across different mouse strains and diets.

Jacqueline Stöckli, Kelsey H Fisher-Wellman, Rima Chaudhuri, Xiao-Yi Zeng, Daniel J Fazakerley, Christopher C Meoli, Kristen C Thomas, Nolan J Hoffman, Salvatore P Mangiafico, Chrysovalantou E Xirouchaki and 7 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The aetiology and molecular landscape of insulin resistance.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Ceramides in Metabolism: Key Lipotoxic Players.Annual review of physiology · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jacqueline StöckliFrom the Charles Perkins Centre, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, the University of Sydney, Sydney NSW 2006, Australia.
Kelsey H Fisher-Wellmanthe Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney NSW 2010, Australia.
Rima ChaudhuriFrom the Charles Perkins Centre, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, the University of Sydney, Sydney NSW 2006, Australia.
Xiao-Yi ZengFrom the Charles Perkins Centre, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, the University of Sydney, Sydney NSW 2006, Australia.
Daniel J FazakerleyFrom the Charles Perkins Centre, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, the University of Sydney, Sydney NSW 2006, Australia.
Christopher C Meolithe Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney NSW 2010, Australia.
Kristen C ThomasFrom the Charles Perkins Centre, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, the University of Sydney, Sydney NSW 2006, Australia.
Nolan J HoffmanFrom the Charles Perkins Centre, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, the University of Sydney, Sydney NSW 2006, Australia.
Salvatore P Mangiaficothe Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne VIC 3010, Australia, and.
Chrysovalantou E Xirouchakithe Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne VIC 3010, Australia, and.
Chieh-Hsin Yangthe Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne VIC 3010, Australia, and.
Olga Ilkayevathe Duke Molecular Physiology Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708.
Kari Wongthe Duke Molecular Physiology Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708.
Gregory J Cooneythe Sydney Medical School, the University of Sydney, Sydney NSW 2006, Australia.
Sofianos Andrikopoulosthe Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne VIC 3010, Australia, and.
Deborah M Muoiothe Duke Molecular Physiology Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708.
David E JamesFrom the Charles Perkins Centre, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, the University of Sydney, Sydney NSW 2006, Australia, david.james@sydney.edu.au.
University of Sydney · AUDuke University · USUniversity of Melbourne · AUGarvan Institute of Medical Research · AU

Funding

TARGETED RESPONSIVE MR AND PET AGENTS FOR B-CELL IMAGINGP01DK058398 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SW MED CTR/DALLAS · PI MUOIO, DEBORAH M · 2000 to 2016
$26.1M
Role of Carnitine Acetyltransferase in Mitochondrial and Metabolic FunctionR01DK089312 · NIDDK · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI DEBORAH M MUOIO · 2010 to 2026
$7.8M
Role of Protein Malonylation in Regulating Mitochondrial FunctionF32DK105665 · NIDDK · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI FISHER-WELLMAN, KELSEY · 2015 to 2017
$130k
NIDDK NIH HHS F32 DK105665NIDDK NIH HHS P01 DK058398NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK089312
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insulin resistance is a major risk factor for many diseases. However, its underlying mechanism remains unclear in part because it is triggered by a complex relationship between multiple factors, including genes and the environment. Here, we used metabolomics combined with computational methods to identify factors that classified insulin resistance across individual mice derived from three different mouse strains fed two different diets. Three inbred ILSXISS strains were fed high-fat or chow diets and subjected to metabolic phenotyping and metabolomics analysis of skeletal muscle. There was significant metabolic heterogeneity between strains, diets, and individual animals. Distinct metabolites were changed with insulin resistance, diet, and between strains. Computational analysis revealed 113 metabolites that were correlated with metabolic phenotypes. Using these 113 metabolites, combined with machine learning to segregate mice based on insulin sensitivity, we identified C22:1-CoA, C2-carnitine, and C16-ceramide as the best classifiers. Strikingly, when these three metabolites were combined into one signature, they classified mice based on insulin sensitivity more accurately than each metabolite on its own or other published metabolic signatures. Furthermore, C22:1-CoA was 2.3-fold higher in insulin-resistant mice and correlated significantly with insulin resistance. We have identified a metabolomic signature composed of three functionally unrelated metabolites that accurately predicts whole-body insulin sensitivity across three mouse strains. These data indicate the power of simultaneous analysis of individual, genetic, and environmental variance in mice for identifying novel factors that accurately predict metabolic phenotypes like whole-body insulin sensitivity.

Indexed as

DietMetabolomeAnimalsComputational BiologyInsulin ResistanceMaleMetabolomicsMiceMice, Inbred Strainsceramidegenetic diversityglucose metabolisminsulin resistancemetabolite signaturemetabolomicsskeletal muscle metabolismstrain differences

Identifiers

PMID28982973
PMCPMC5702658
OpenAlexW2761717920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.