Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28982390›Full record

ArticleVeterinary research2017

Limitations of using feline coronavirus spike protein gene mutations to diagnose feline infectious peritonitis.

Emily N Barker, Angelica Stranieri, Chris R Helps, Emily L Porter, Andrew D Davidson, Michael J Day, Toby Knowles, Anja Kipar, Séverine Tasker

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Emily N BarkerSchool of Veterinary Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. emi.barker@bristol.ac.uk.
Angelica StranieriUniversity of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Chris R HelpsSchool of Veterinary Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Emily L PorterSchool of Veterinary Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Andrew D DavidsonSchool of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Michael J DaySchool of Veterinary Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Toby KnowlesSchool of Veterinary Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Anja KiparInstitute of Veterinary Pathology, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Séverine TaskerSchool of Veterinary Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
University of Bristol · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GBUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Feline infectious peritonitis (FIP) is a fatal disease of cats, and a sequela of systemic feline coronavirus (FCoV) infection. Mutations in the viral spike (S) gene have been associated with FCoVs found in tissues from cats with FIP, but not FCoVs found in faeces from healthy cats, and are implicated in monocyte/macrophage tropism and systemic spread. This study was designed to determine whether S gene mutation analysis can reliably diagnose FIP. Cats were categorised as with FIP (n = 57) or without FIP (n = 45) based on gross post-mortem and histopathological examination including immunohistochemistry for FCoV antigen. RNA was purified from available tissue, fluid and faeces. Reverse-transcriptase quantitative-PCR (RT-qPCR) was performed on all samples using FCoV-specific primers, followed by sequencing of a section of the S gene on RT-qPCR positive samples. Samples were available from a total of 102 cats. Tissue, fluid, and faecal samples from cats with FIP were more likely to be FCoV RT-qPCR-positive (90.4, 78.4 and 64.6% respectively) than those from cats without FIP (7.8, 2.1 and 20% respectively). Identification of S gene mutated FCoVs as an additional step to the detection of FCoV alone, only moderately increased specificity for tissue samples (from 92.6 to 94.6%) but specificity was unchanged for fluid samples (97.9%) for FIP diagnosis; however, sensitivity was markedly decreased for tissue (from 89.8 to 80.9%) and fluid samples (from 78.4 to 60%) for FIP diagnosis. These findings demonstrate that S gene mutation analysis in FCoVs does not substantially improve the ability to diagnose FIP as compared to detection of FCoV alone.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigens, ViralCatsCoronavirus, FelineFecesFeline Infectious PeritonitisGenes, ViralMutationReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionSequence Analysis, DNASpike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusAntigens, ViralSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus

Identifiers

PMID28982390
PMCPMC5629788
OpenAlexW2762803536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.