Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28982380›Full record

Trial reportTrials2017

Effectiveness of the 'Who's Challenging Who' support staff training intervention to improve attitudes and empathy towards adults with intellectual disability and challenging behaviours: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial.

Elizabeth Randell, Richard P Hastings, Rachel McNamara, Roseanna Knight, David Gillespie, Zachary Taylor

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth RandellCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK. randelle@cardiff.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1606-3175
Richard P HastingsCentre for Educational Development, Appraisal, and Research (CEDAR) University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Rachel McNamaraCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Roseanna KnightCentre for Educational Development, Appraisal, and Research (CEDAR) University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
David GillespieCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Zachary TaylorRoyal Mencap Society, Unit 7 Sundon Business Park, Dencora Way, Luton, UK.
Cardiff University · GBUniversity of Warwick · GBRoyal Society · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFindings suggest approximately one in six people with intellectual disability engage in 'challenging behaviours', which include aggression towards others/property and self-injurious actions. In residential settings, actions of staff members can make challenging behaviours more likely to occur, or make these behaviours worse. In particular, negative attitudes from members of staff and lack of understanding about the reasons for challenging behaviour are contributory factors. 'Who's Challenging Who?' (WCW) training is designed to emphasise the role of staff in residential settings as a challenge also to people with intellectual disability. The course is delivered jointly by a trainer with intellectual disability who has been labelled as having challenging behaviour, along with a trainer without intellectual disability.

methodsThis is a cluster randomised two-arm trial of WCW training versus a waiting list control. Overall, 118 residential settings will be recruited and randomised on a 1:1 ratio. Within each setting, two members of staff will be invited to take part in the trial. Participants will complete assessments at baseline and at 6 and 20 weeks. WCW is a half day initial training course with some follow-on coaching to ensure implementation. The primary outcome is changes in staff empathy towards people with challenging behaviour. Secondary outcomes at the staff level include confidence, attitudes and work-related well-being. Secondary outcomes at the residential setting level include recorded incidents of aggressive challenging behaviour, and use of any restrictive practices. DISCUSSION: If the results of the cluster randomised trial are positive, we will disseminate the findings widely and make all training manuals and materials freely available for anyone in intellectual disability services (and beyond) to use. Our training approach may have wider implications in other areas of social care. It may also provide a generally applicable model for how to train people with intellectual disability to act as co-trainers in intellectual disability social care settings. People with intellectual disability and challenging behaviour have already been involved centrally with the design, development and pilot evaluation of WCW and will also be fully involved throughout this trial.

trial registrationRegistered on the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number registry on 8th December 2015: ISRCTN53763600 .

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelEmpathyHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdaptation, PsychologicalAggressionComprehensionHealth PersonnelHumansInservice TrainingIntellectual DisabilityPersons with DisabilitiesProblem BehaviorProfessional-Patient RelationsResearch DesignResidential FacilitiesSelf-Injurious BehaviorAttitudesChallenging behaviourContact hypothesisCo-trainersEmpathyIntellectual disabilityStaff

Identifiers

PMID28982380
PMCPMC5629774
OpenAlexW2764026849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.