Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28982362›Full record

ReviewInternational journal for equity in health2017

The scope and impact of mobile health clinics in the United States: a literature review.

Stephanie W Y Yu, Caterina Hill, Mariesa L Ricks, Jennifer Bennet, Nancy E Oriol

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal for equity in health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 163 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
163citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04804072 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

INTEGRA: A Vanguard Study of Health Service Delivery in a Mobile Health Delivery Unit to Link Persons Who Inject Drugs to Integrated Care and Prevention for Addiction, HIV, HCV and Primary Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorHIV Prevention Trials NetworkRan2021 to 2024Enrolled447ConditionsHIV Infections, Drug Use, Opioid Use, Opioid-use DisorderArmsMedication for opioid-use disorder (MOUD) for opioid-use disorder (OUD), HIV testing, HIV treatment for participants living with HIV not already in care, PrEP for participants without HIV, Testing and referral for vaccination or treatment for hepatitis A virus (HAV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV)
NCT05013710 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Evaluating the Mobile Clinic Model as a Means of Increasing Access to Reproductive and Sexual Health

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorPlan A Health, IncRan2021 to 2024Enrolled10,000ConditionsHealthcare Disparities, Reproductive Health, Sexual Health, Program EvaluationArmsComplete Clinical Interaction
NCT07747519 naenrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Addressing Postpartum Visit Attendance Through Mobile Health: A Feasibility Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of Postpartum Mobile Van Visits

TypeinterventionalSponsorWomen and Infants Hospital of Rhode IslandRan2026 to 2027Enrolled100ConditionsPostpartum, NeonatalArmsClinic Postpartum Care, Mobile Postpartum Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

163 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Access to Geriatric Disability Care in India: A Roadmap for Research.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. [Mobility services in primary care: An overview of existing types of services and potentials for the German healthcare system].Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) · 2026
    Review
  10. No Roadblocks: How Mobile Primary Care Navigates Barriers to Health Access.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Multisite Mobile Addiction Services: Four-Year Outcomes.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  13. Optimizing mobile health clinic placement via geospatial modeling.Public health in practice (Oxford, England) · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. What Do We Know About Rural Mobile Health Clinics? A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

103 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Stephanie W Y YuLi Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, 21 Sassoon Rd, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region of China. YuSteph@hku.hk.
Caterina HillDepartment of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, c/o The Family Van, 1542 Tremont St, Roxbury, MA, 02120, USA.
Mariesa L RicksHarvard Business School, Soldiers Field, Boston, MA, 02163, USA.
Jennifer BennetThe Family Van: Harvard Medical School, 1542 Tremont St, Roxbury, MA, 02120, USA.
Nancy E OriolHarvard Medical School, 260 Longwood Ave, Suite 244, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the U.S. healthcare system transforms its care delivery model to increase healthcare accessibility and improve health outcomes, it is undergoing changes in the context of ever-increasing chronic disease burdens and healthcare costs. Many illnesses disproportionately affect certain populations, due to disparities in healthcare access and social determinants of health. These disparities represent a key area to target in order to better our nation's overall health and decrease healthcare expenditures. It is thus imperative for policymakers and health professionals to develop innovative interventions that sustainably manage chronic diseases, promote preventative health, and improve outcomes among communities disenfranchised from traditional healthcare as well as among the general population. This article examines the available literature on Mobile Health Clinics (MHCs) and the role that they currently play in the U.S. healthcare system. Based on a search in the PubMed database and data from the online collaborative research network of mobile clinics MobileHealthMap.org , the authors evaluated 51 articles with evidence on the strengths and weaknesses of the mobile health sector in the United States. Current literature supports that MHCs are successful in reaching vulnerable populations, by delivering services directly at the curbside in communities of need and flexibly adapting their services based on the changing needs of the target community. As a link between clinical and community settings, MHCs address both medical and social determinants of health, tackling health issues on a community-wide level. Furthermore, evidence suggest that MHCs produce significant cost savings and represent a cost-effective care delivery model that improves health outcomes in underserved groups. Even though MHCs can fulfill many goals and mandates in alignment with our national priorities and have the potential to help combat some of the largest healthcare challenges of this era, there are limitations and challenges to this healthcare delivery model that must be addressed and overcome before they can be more broadly integrated into our healthcare system.

Indexed as

Health Services ResearchMobile Health UnitsChronic DiseaseDelivery of Health CareHealth Services AccessibilityHumansUnited StatesChronic disease managementCommunity-clinical linkageCost-effectivenessHealth disparitiesMobile health clinicsPopulation healthPreventative careSocial determinants of health

Identifiers

PMID28982362
PMCPMC5629787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.