Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28982136›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Augmentation of VAMP-catalytic activity of botulinum neurotoxin serotype B does not result in increased potency in physiological systems.

Mark Elliott, Jacquie Maignel, Sai Man Liu, Christine Favre-Guilmard, Imran Mir, Paul Farrow, Fraser Hornby, Sandra Marlin, Shilpa Palan, Matthew Beard and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Novel Native and Engineered Botulinum Neurotoxins.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2021
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Botulinum and Tetanus Neurotoxins.Annual review of biochemistry · 2019
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mark ElliottIpsen Bioinnovation, 102 Park Drive, Milton Park, Abingdon, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5281-7245
Jacquie MaignelIpsen Innovation, Les Ulis, France.
Sai Man LiuIpsen Bioinnovation, 102 Park Drive, Milton Park, Abingdon, United Kingdom.
Christine Favre-GuilmardIpsen Innovation, Les Ulis, France.
Imran MirIpsen Bioinnovation, 102 Park Drive, Milton Park, Abingdon, United Kingdom.
Paul FarrowIpsen Bioinnovation, 102 Park Drive, Milton Park, Abingdon, United Kingdom.
Fraser HornbyIpsen Bioinnovation, 102 Park Drive, Milton Park, Abingdon, United Kingdom.
Sandra MarlinIpsen Bioinnovation, 102 Park Drive, Milton Park, Abingdon, United Kingdom.
Shilpa PalanIpsen Bioinnovation, 102 Park Drive, Milton Park, Abingdon, United Kingdom.
Matthew BeardIpsen Bioinnovation, 102 Park Drive, Milton Park, Abingdon, United Kingdom.
Johannes KruppIpsen Innovation, Les Ulis, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs) are used extensively as therapeutic agents. Serotypes A and B are available as marketed products. Higher doses of BoNT/B are required to reach an efficacy similar to that of products containing BoNT/A. Advances in our understanding of BoNT/B mechanism of action have afforded the opportunity to make rational modifications to the toxin aimed at increasing its activity. Recently, a mutation in the light chain of BoNT/B (S201P) was described that increases the catalytic activity of the isolated BoNT/B light chain in biochemical assays. In this study, we have produced two full-length recombinant BoNT/B toxins in E.coli-one wild type (rBoNT/B1) and one incorporating the S201P mutation (rBoNT/B1(S201P)). We have compared the activity of these two molecules along with a native BoNT/B1 in biochemical cell-free assays and in several biological systems. In the cell-free assay, which measured light-chain activity alone, rBoNT/B1(S201P) cleaved VAMP-2 and VAMP-1 substrate with an activity 3-4-fold higher than rBoNT/B1. However, despite the enhanced catalytic activity of rBoNT/B1(S201P), there was no significant difference in potency between the two molecules in any of the in vitro cell-based assays, using either rodent spinal cord neurons or cortical neurons. Similarly in ex vivo tissue preparations rBoNT/B1(S201P) was not significantly more potent than rBoNT/B1 at inhibiting either diaphragm or detrusor (bladder) muscle activity in C57BL/6N and CD1 mice. Finally, no differences between rBoNT/B1 and rBoNT/B1(S201P) were observed in an in vivo digit abduction score (DAS) assay in C57BL/6N mice, either in efficacy or safety parameters. The lack of translation from the enhanced BoNT/B1(S201P) catalytic activity to potency in complex biological systems suggests that the catalytic step is not the rate-limiting factor for BoNT/B to reach maximum efficacy. In order to augment the efficacy of BoNT/B in humans, strategies other than enhancing light chain activity may need to be considered.

Indexed as

AnimalsBotulinum Toxins, Type ACatalysisCells, CulturedCloning, MolecularEscherichia coliIn Vitro TechniquesMiceMice, Inbred C57BLPatch-Clamp TechniquesRatsVesicle-Associated Membrane Protein 1Vesicle-Associated Membrane Protein 2Botulinum Toxins, Type ArimabotulinumtoxinBVesicle-Associated Membrane Protein 1Vesicle-Associated Membrane Protein 2

Identifiers

PMID28982136
PMCPMC5628846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.