Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28982111›Full record

Observational studyBritish journal of cancer2017

The characteristics and outcomes of small bowel adenocarcinoma: a multicentre retrospective observational study.

Hiroyuki Sakae, Hiromitsu Kanzaki, Junichiro Nasu, Yutaka Akimoto, Kazuhiro Matsueda, Masao Yoshioka, Masahiro Nakagawa, Shinichiro Hori, Masafumi Inoue, Tomoki Inaba and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in British journal of cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. [Primary small bowel malignancies].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Hiroyuki SakaeDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-Ku, Okayama 700-8558, Japan.
Hiromitsu KanzakiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-Ku, Okayama 700-8558, Japan.
Junichiro NasuDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-Ku, Okayama 700-8558, Japan.
Yutaka AkimotoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-Ku, Okayama 700-8558, Japan.
Kazuhiro MatsuedaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kurashiki Central Hospital, 1-1-1 Miwa, Kurashiki, Okayama 710-8602, Japan.
Masao YoshiokaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Okayama Saiseikai General Hospital, 2-25 Kokutai-cho, Kita-Ku, Okayama 700-8511, Japan.
Masahiro NakagawaDepartment of Endoscopy, Hiroshima City Hiroshima Citizens Hospital, 7-33 Motomachi, Naka-Ku, Hiroshima 730-8518, Japan.
Shinichiro HoriDepartment of Endoscopy, National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center, 160 Kou, Minamiumemoto-machi, Matsuyama, Ehime 791-0280, Japan.
Masafumi InoueDepartment of Gastroenterology, Japanese Red Cross Okayama Hospital, 2-1-1 Aoe, Kita-Ku, Okayama 700-8607, Japan.
Tomoki InabaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kagawa Prefectural Central Hospital, 5-4-6 Ban-cho, Takamatsu, Kagawa 760-8557, Japan.
Atsushi ImagawaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Mitoyo General Hospital, 708 Himehama, Kanonji, Kagawa 769-1695, Japan.
Masahiro TakataniDepartment of Internal Medicine, Japanese Red Cross Society Himeji Hospital, 1-12-1 Shimoteno, Himeji, Hyogo 670-8540, Japan.
Ryuta TakenakaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Tsuyama Chuo Hospital, 1756 Kawasaki, Tsuyama, Okayama 708-0848, Japan.
Seiyu SuzukiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Sumitomo Besshi Hospital, 3-1 Ouji-cho, Niihama, Ehime 792-8543, Japan.
Toshiyoshi FujiwaraDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-Ku, Okayama 700-8558, Japan.
Hiroyuki OkadaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-Ku, Okayama 700-8558, Japan.
Okayama University · JPHimeji Red Cross Hospital · JPHiroshima City Asa Citizens Hospital · JPKagawa Prefectural Central Hospital · JPKurashiki Central Hospital · JPMito Saiseikai General Hospital · JPOkayama Red Cross General Hospital · JPOkayama Saiseikai General Hospital · JPShikoku Cancer Center · JPSumitomo Besshi Hospital · JPTsuyama Chuo Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSmall bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) is a rare malignancy that accounts for 1-2% of gastrointestinal tumours. We investigated the clinical characteristics, outcomes, and prognostic factors of primary SBA.

methodsWe retrospectively analysed the characteristics and clinical courses of 205 SBA patients from 11 institutions in Japan between June 2002 and August 2013.

resultsThe primary tumour was in the duodenum and jejunum/ileum in 149 (72.7%) and 56 (27.3%) patients, respectively. Sixty-four patients (43.0%) with duodenal adenocarcinoma were asymptomatic and most cases were detected by oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), which was not specifically performed for the detection or surveillance of duodenal tumours. In contrast, 47 patients (83.9%) with jejunoileal carcinoma were symptomatic. The 3-year survival rate for stage 0/I, II, III, and IV cancers was 93.4%, 73.1%, 50.9%, and 15.1%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed performance status 3-4, high carcinoembryonic antigen, high lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), low albumin, symptomatic at diagnosis, and stage III/IV disease were independent factors for overall survival (OS). Ten patients (18.5%) with stage IV disease were treated with a combination of resection of primary tumour, local treatment of metastasis, and chemotherapy; this group had a median OS of 36.9 months.

conclusionsAlthough most SBA patients were diagnosed with symptomatic, advanced stage disease, some patients with duodenal carcinoma were detected in early stage by EGD. High LDH and symptomatic at diagnosis were identified as novel independent prognostic factors for OS. The prognosis of advanced SBA was poor, but combined modality therapy with local treatment of metastasis might prolong patient survival.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDuodenal NeoplasmsEndoscopy, Digestive SystemFemaleHumansIleal NeoplasmsIntestinal NeoplasmsJejunal NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID28982111
PMCPMC5729438
OpenAlexW2761132073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.