ReviewAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences2017
Team science and the physician-scientist in the age of grand health challenges.
Review in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stabilizing and strengthening the US physician-scientist faculty workforce in academic medicine: a proposed institutional framework.JCI insight · 2026Article
- Exploration and Practice of the First Clinical Medical Postdoctoral Program in China: Retrospective, Nonrandomized, Controlled Study.JMIR medical education · 2025Article
- How Team Science Is Documented and Described in Published Family Medicine Research.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM · 2025Article
- From Imaging to Impact: A Multi-Disciplinary T32 Program Framework and Initial Insights for Training in Image-Guided Cancer Therapy [Advance Publication].Advances in cancer education and quality improvement · 2025Article
- Targeting bacterial transcription factors for infection control: opportunities and challenges.Transcription · 2025Review
- Medicine Meets Science: The Imperative of Scientific Research and Publishing for Physician-Scientists.The Indian journal of radiology & imaging · 2025Article
- Learning to Prioritize Our Collaborative Opportunities: Overcoming the Bright Shiny Object Syndrome.The Journal of continuing education in the health professions · 2023Article
- Maximizing Training and Mentorship in Sex as a Biological Variable Research Across Different Brain-Body Disorders.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2023Article
- Research in orthopaedic trauma surgery: approaches of basic scientists and clinicians and the relevance of interprofessional research teams.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2023Review
- Optimizing team science in an academic medical center: A qualitative examination of investigator perspectives.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2023Article
- Physician-Scientists: Fixing the Leaking Pipeline - A Scoping Review.Medical science educator · 2022Article
- Fostering student and faculty scholarship in an accelerated three-year medical school.MedEdPublish (2016) · 2022Article
- Clinician-Scientist Faculty Mentoring Program (FAME) - A New Inclusive Training Model at Penn State Increases Scholarly Productivity and Extramural Grant Funding.Advances in medical education and practice · 2022Article
- Future Objectivity Requires Perspective and Forward Combinatorial Meta-Analyses.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Rethinking Health Professionals' Motivation to Do Research: A Systematic Review.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2022Review
- Medicinae investigationis, quo vadis?Journal of investigative medicine : the official publication of the American Federation for Clinical Research · 2021Article
- The Rockefeller Team Science Leadership training program: Curriculum, standardized assessment of competencies, and impact of returning assessments.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2021Article
- Impact of a Respiratory Disease Young Investigators' Forum on the Career Development of Physician-Scientists.ATS scholar · 2020Article
- Promoting interdisciplinary research to respond to public health crises: The response of the Columbia University CTSA to the opioid crisis.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2020Article
- Different sliding mechanics in space closure of lingual orthodontics: a translational study by three-dimensional finite element method.American journal of translational research · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite remarkable advances in medical research, clinicians face daunting challenges from new diseases, variations in patient responses to interventions, and increasing numbers of people with chronic health problems. The gap between biomedical research and unmet clinical needs can be addressed by highly talented interdisciplinary investigators focused on translational bench-to-bedside medicine. The training of talented physician-scientists comfortable with forming and participating in multidisciplinary teams that address complex health problems is a top national priority. Challenges, methods, and experiences associated with physician-scientist training and team building were explored at a workshop held at the Second International Conference on One Medicine One Science (iCOMOS 2016), April 24-27, 2016, in Minneapolis, Minnesota. A broad range of scientists, regulatory authorities, and health care experts determined that critical investments in interdisciplinary training are essential for the future of medicine and healthcare delivery. Physician-scientists trained in a broad, nonlinear, cross-disciplinary manner are and will be essential members of science teams in the new age of grand health challenges and the birth of precision medicine. Team science approaches have accomplished biomedical breakthroughs once considered impossible, and dedicated physician-scientists have been critical to these achievements. Together, they translate into the pillars of academic growth and success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.