ArticleNucleic acids research2017
Ritornello: high fidelity control-free chromatin immunoprecipitation peak calling.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Accurate chromatin marks peak calling with Omnipeak.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Comprehensive analysis of computational approaches in plant transcription factors binding regions discovery.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Rescuing biologically relevant consensus regions across replicated samples.BMC bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Multi Locus View: an extensible web-based tool for the analysis of genomic data.Communications biology · 2021Article
- Theoretical characterisation of strand cross-correlation in ChIP-seq.BMC bioinformatics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the advent of next generation high-throughput DNA sequencing technologies, omics experiments have become the mainstay for studying diverse biological effects on a genome wide scale. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP-seq) is the omics technique that enables genome wide localization of transcription factor (TF) binding or epigenetic modification events. Since the inception of ChIP-seq in 2007, many methods have been developed to infer ChIP-target binding loci from the resultant reads after mapping them to a reference genome. However, interpreting these data has proven challenging, and as such these algorithms have several shortcomings, including susceptibility to false positives due to artifactual peaks, poor localization of binding sites and the requirement for a total DNA input control which increases the cost of performing these experiments. We present Ritornello, a new approach for finding TF-binding sites in ChIP-seq, with roots in digital signal processing that addresses all of these problems. We show that Ritornello generally performs equally or better than the peak callers tested and recommended by the ENCODE consortium, but in contrast, Ritornello does not require a matched total DNA input control to avoid false positives, effectively decreasing the sequencing cost to perform ChIP-seq. Ritornello is freely available at https://github.com/KlugerLab/Ritornello.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.