Trial reportSchizophrenia bulletin2018
Predicting Response to Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Patients With Schizophrenia Using Structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Multisite Machine Learning Analysis.
Trial report in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00783120 (Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation), which is not on this map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) for the Treatment of Negative Symptoms in Schizophrenia - a Multicenter Study
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 85 citations in OpenAlex.
- Implementing Precision Psychiatry: A Systematic Review of Individualized Prediction Models for Clinical Practice.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2021Pooled it
- Brain connectomics markers for response prediction to transcranial magnetic stimulation in cocaine use disorder.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- Multimodal workflows optimally predict response to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with schizophrenia: a multisite machine learning analysis.Translational psychiatry · 2024Trial
- Efficacy and Safety of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Treating Negative Symptoms in Schizophrenia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA psychiatry · 2020Trial
- Cortical Structures Underlying Schizophrenia and Sex Differences in Preadolescents: An Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study.Child psychiatry and human development · 2026Article
- Identifying transdiagnostic neurobiomarkers for precision major psychiatric disordersJournal of translational internal medicine · 2026Article
- Decoding psychotropic-induced metabolic disturbances: gut-brain axis, multi-omics, and nutrition-lifestyle integration.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
- Clinician perspectives on explainability in AI-driven closed-loop neurotechnology.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Neuromodulation and neural networks in psychiatric disorders: current status and emerging prospects.Psychological medicine · 2025Review
- Can artificial intelligence be the future solution to the enormous challenges and suffering caused by Schizophrenia?Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Machine learning-based prediction of antipsychotic efficacy from brain gray matter structure in drug-naive first-episode schizophrenia.Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Predicting rTMS treatment response in schizophrenia using interpretable machine learning: a SHAP-based analysis.Therapeutic advances in psychopharmacology · 2025Article
- Individualized multi-modal MRI biomarkers predict 1-year clinical outcome in first-episode drug-naïve schizophrenia patients.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Article
- Deep learning and machine learning in psychiatry: a survey of current progress in depression detection, diagnosis and treatment.Brain informatics · 2023Review
- Methodological and Quality Flaws in the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Mental Health Research: Systematic Review.JMIR mental health · 2023Review
- Application of machine learning in predicting aggressive behaviors from hospitalized patients with schizophrenia.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Article
- Rationale and study design of a trial to assessContemporary clinical trials communications · 2022Article
- Concept of the Munich/Augsburg Consortium Precision in Mental Health for the German Center of Mental Health.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Review
- Predicting the Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Cognitive Functions in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease by Automated EEG Analysis.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2022Article
- Developments in Biological Mechanisms and Treatments for Negative Symptoms and Cognitive Dysfunction of Schizophrenia.Neuroscience bulletin · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
27 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The variability of responses to plasticity-inducing repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) challenges its successful application in psychiatric care. No objective means currently exists to individually predict the patients' response to rTMS. Methods: We used machine learning to develop and validate such tools using the pre-treatment structural Magnetic Resonance Images (sMRI) of 92 patients with schizophrenia enrolled in the multisite RESIS trial (http://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00783120): patients were randomized to either active (N = 45) or sham (N = 47) 10-Hz rTMS applied to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex 5 days per week for 21 days. The prediction target was nonresponse vs response defined by a ≥20% pre-post Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) negative score reduction. Results: Our models predicted this endpoint with a cross-validated balanced accuracy (BAC) of 85% (nonresponse/response: 79%/90%) in patients receiving active rTMS, but only with 51% (48%/55%) in the sham-treated sample. Leave-site-out cross-validation demonstrated cross-site generalizability of the active rTMS predictor despite smaller training samples (BAC: 71%). The predictive pre-treatment pattern involved gray matter density reductions in prefrontal, insular, medio-temporal, and cerebellar cortices, and increments in parietal and thalamic structures. The low BAC of 58% produced by the active rTMS predictor in sham-treated patients, as well as its poor performance in predicting positive symptom courses supported the therapeutic specificity of this brain pattern. Conclusions: Individual responses to active rTMS in patients with predominant negative schizophrenia may be accurately predicted using structural neuromarkers. Further multisite studies are needed to externally validate the proposed treatment stratifier and develop more personalized and biologically informed rTMS interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.