Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28981848›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia bulletin2018

Social Cognition Psychometric Evaluation: Results of the Final Validation Study.

Amy E Pinkham, Philip D Harvey, David L Penn

Registry-linked trialAbstract readValidation Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06286202 (Integrative Neuro-social Cognitive Strategy Programme for Instilling REcovery), which is not on this map. Cited by 159 papers, 14 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
159citing papers in PubMed, 14 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06286202 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Integrative Neuro-social Cognitive Strategy Programme for Instilling REcovery (INSPIRE): a Community-Based Cognitive Remediation Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorSingapore Institute of TechnologyRan2024 to 2027Enrolled160ConditionsSchizophrenia, Schizoaffective DisorderArmsCognitive Remediation: Adapted Neuropsychological and Education Approach to Remediation (NEAR), Standard Psychiatric Rehabilitation at Anglican Care Centers
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

159 citing papers in PubMed, 14 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. European Psychiatric Association guidance on assessment of cognitive impairment in schizophrenia.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2022
    Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. A Systematic Review of the Current Measures of Theory of Mind in Adults with Schizophrenia.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Article

99 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Amy E PinkhamSchool of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX.
Philip D HarveyDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL.
David L PennDepartment of Psychology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.

Funding

Social Cognition Psychometric EvaluationR01MH093432 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI HARVEY, PHILIP D., PENN, DAVID LEWIS · 2012 to 2016
$3.2M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH093432
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social cognition is increasingly recognized as an important treatment target in schizophrenia; however, the dearth of well-validated measures that are suitable for use in clinical trials remains a significant limitation. The Social Cognition Psychometric Evaluation (SCOPE) study addresses this need by systematically evaluating the psychometric properties of promising measures. In this final phase of SCOPE, eight new or modified tasks were evaluated. Stable outpatients with schizophrenia (n = 218) and healthy controls (n = 154) completed the battery at baseline and 2-4 weeks later across three sites. Tasks included the Bell Lysaker Emotion Recognition Task (BLERT), Penn Emotion Recognition Task (ER-40), Reading the Mind in the Eyes Task (Eyes), The Awareness of Social Inferences Test (TASIT), Hinting Task, Mini Profile of Nonverbal Sensitivity (MiniPONS), Social Attribution Task-Multiple Choice (SAT-MC), and Intentionality Bias Task (IBT). BLERT and ER-40 modifications included response time and confidence ratings. The Eyes task was modified to include definitions of terms and TASIT to include response time. Hinting was scored with more stringent criteria. MiniPONS, SAT-MC, and IBT were new to this phase. Tasks were evaluated on (1) test-retest reliability, (2) utility as a repeated measure, (3) relationship to functional outcome, (4) practicality and tolerability, (5) sensitivity to group differences, and (6) internal consistency. Hinting, BLERT, and ER-40 showed the strongest psychometric properties and are recommended for use in clinical trials. Eyes, TASIT, and IBT showed somewhat weaker psychometric properties and require further study. MiniPONS and SAT-MC showed poorer psychometric properties that suggest caution for their use in clinical trials.

Indexed as

Social PerceptionAdultCognitive DysfunctionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSchizophreniaTheory of Mind

Identifiers

PMID28981848
PMCPMC6007629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.