Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28981749›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2017

Chromatin proteomics reveals novel combinatorial histone modification signatures that mark distinct subpopulations of macrophage enhancers.

Monica Soldi, Tommaso Mari, Luciano Nicosia, Daniele Musiani, Gianluca Sigismondo, Alessandro Cuomo, Giulio Pavesi, Tiziana Bonaldi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Prognosis of colon cancer patients based on enhancer RNAs-related genes.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Epigenetic regulation of renal development.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2019
    Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Monica SoldiDepartment of Experimental Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan 20139, Italy.
Tommaso MariDepartment of Experimental Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan 20139, Italy.
Luciano NicosiaDepartment of Experimental Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan 20139, Italy.
Daniele MusianiDepartment of Experimental Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan 20139, Italy.
Gianluca SigismondoDepartment of Experimental Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan 20139, Italy.
Alessandro CuomoDepartment of Experimental Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan 20139, Italy.
Giulio PavesiDepartment of Biosciences, Milan University, Milan 20133, Italy.
Tiziana BonaldiDepartment of Experimental Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan 20139, Italy.
European Institute of Oncology · ITUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The integrated activity of cis-regulatory elements fine-tunes transcriptional programs of mammalian cells by recruiting cell type-specific as well as ubiquitous transcription factors (TFs). Despite their key role in modulating transcription, enhancers are still poorly characterized at the molecular level, and their limited DNA sequence conservation in evolution and variable distance from target genes make their unbiased identification challenging. The coexistence of high mono-methylation and low tri-methylation levels of lysine 4 of histone H3 is considered a signature of enhancers, but a comprehensive view of histone modifications associated to enhancers is still lacking. By combining chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) with mass spectrometry, we investigated cis-regulatory regions in macrophages to comprehensively identify histone marks specifically associated with enhancers, and to profile their dynamics after transcriptional activation elicited by an inflammatory stimulation. The intersection of the proteomics data with ChIP-seq and RNA-seq analyses revealed the existence of novel subpopulations of enhancers, marked by specific histone modification signatures: specifically, H3K4me1/K36me2 marks transcribed enhancers, while H3K4me1/K36me3 and H3K4me1/K79me2 combinations mark distinct classes of intronic enhancers. Thus, our MS analysis of functionally distinct genomic regions revealed the combinatorial code of histone modifications, highlighting the potential of proteomics in addressing fundamental questions in epigenetics.

Indexed as

Histone CodeAnimalsCell LineChromatinEnhancer Elements, GeneticGenomeHistonesIntronsLipopolysaccharidesMacrophagesMass SpectrometryMiceProteomicsTranscription, GeneticChromatinHistonesLipopolysaccharides

Identifiers

PMID28981749
PMCPMC5716071
OpenAlexW2754079466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.