Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28981580›Full record

ReviewAnnals of botany2017

Cell cycle arrest in plants: what distinguishes quiescence, dormancy and differentiated G1?

Yazhini Velappan, Santiago Signorelli, Michael J Considine

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of botany, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
10.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Cyclin' Through the Root: Developmental Control of Cell Cycle Progression in theAnnual review of cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Journal of genetics · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Stem cell quiescence and dormancy in plant meristems.Journal of experimental botany · 2024
    Review
  17. Redox regulation of meristem quiescence: outside/in.Journal of experimental botany · 2024
    Review
  18. Molecular advances in bud dormancy in trees.Journal of experimental botany · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Yazhini VelappanThe UWA Institute of Agriculture, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA 6009, Australia.
Santiago SignorelliThe UWA Institute of Agriculture, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA 6009, Australia.
Michael J ConsidineThe UWA Institute of Agriculture, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA 6009, Australia.
University of Western Australia · AUDepartment of Agriculture and Food Western Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Quiescence is a fundamental feature of plant life, which enables plasticity, renewal and fidelity of the somatic cell line. Cellular quiescence is defined by arrest in a particular phase of the cell cycle, typically G1 or G2; however, the regulation of quiescence and proliferation can also be considered across wider scales in space and time. As such, quiescence is a defining feature of plant development and phenology, from meristematic stem cell progenitors to terminally differentiated cells, as well as dormant or suppressed seeds and buds. While the physiology of each of these states differs considerably, each is referred to as 'cell cycle arrest' or 'G1 arrest'. Scope: Here the physiology and molecular regulation of (1) meristematic quiescence, (2) dormancy and (3) terminal differentiation (cell cycle exit) are considered in order to determine whether and how the molecular decisions guiding these nuclear states are distinct. A brief overview of the canonical cell cycle regulators is provided, and the genetic and genomic, as well as physiological, evidence is considered regarding two primary questions: (1) Are the canonical cell cycle regulators superior or subordinate in the regulation of quiescence? (2) Are these three modes of quiescence governed by distinct molecular controls? Conclusion: Meristematic quiescence, dormancy and terminal differentiation are each predominantly characterized by G1 arrest but regulated distinctly, at a level largely superior to the canonical cell cycle. Meristematic quiescence is intrinsically linked to non-cell-autonomous regulation of meristem cell identity, and particularly through the influence of ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis, in partnership with reactive oxygen species, abscisic acid and auxin. The regulation of terminal differentiation shares analogous features with meristematic quiescence, albeit with specific activators and a greater role for cytokinin signalling. Dormancy meanwhile appears to be regulated at the level of chromatin accessibility, by Polycomb group-type histone modifications of particular dormancy genes.

Indexed as

Cell Cycle CheckpointsG1 PhaseMeristemPlant DevelopmentPlant DormancyPlant RootsPlantsPlant ShootsResting Phase, Cell CycleS Phasebranchingcell cyclechromatindifferentiationDormancyhormonemeristemmitosisproliferationquiescencereactive oxygen speciesubiquitin-dependent proteolysis

Identifiers

PMID28981580
PMCPMC5737280
OpenAlexW2737489252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.