Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28981546›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Recapitulation of Ayurveda constitution types by machine learning of phenotypic traits.

Pradeep Tiwari, Rintu Kutum, Tavpritesh Sethi, Ankita Shrivastava, Bhushan Girase, Shilpi Aggarwal, Rutuja Patil, Dhiraj Agarwal, Pramod Gautam, Anurag Agrawal and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Ayurgenomics and Modern Medicine.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Pradeep TiwariGenomics and Molecular Medicine, CSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, India.
Rintu KutumCSIR's Ayurgenomics Unit-TRISUTRA (Translational Research and Innovative Science ThRough Ayurgenomics) CSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, India.
Tavpritesh SethiGenomics and Molecular Medicine, CSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, India.
Ankita ShrivastavaVadu Rural Health Program, KEM Hospital Research Centre, Pune, India.
Bhushan GiraseVadu Rural Health Program, KEM Hospital Research Centre, Pune, India.
Shilpi AggarwalGenomics and Molecular Medicine, CSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, India.
Rutuja PatilVadu Rural Health Program, KEM Hospital Research Centre, Pune, India.
Dhiraj AgarwalVadu Rural Health Program, KEM Hospital Research Centre, Pune, India.
Pramod GautamGenomics and Molecular Medicine, CSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, India.
Anurag AgrawalGenomics and Molecular Medicine, CSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, India.
Debasis DashAcademy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), CSIR-IGIB, Delhi, India.
Saurabh GhoshHuman Genetics Unit, Indian Statistical Institute, Kolkata, India.
Sanjay JuvekarVadu Rural Health Program, KEM Hospital Research Centre, Pune, India.
Mitali MukerjiGenomics and Molecular Medicine, CSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, India.
Bhavana PrasherGenomics and Molecular Medicine, CSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4185-4400

Funding

DBT-Wellcome Trust India Alliance IA/CPHE/14/1/501504
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Ayurveda system of medicine individuals are classified into seven constitution types, "Prakriti", for assessing disease susceptibility and drug responsiveness. Prakriti evaluation involves clinical examination including questions about physiological and behavioural traits. A need was felt to develop models for accurately predicting Prakriti classes that have been shown to exhibit molecular differences. The present study was carried out on data of phenotypic attributes in 147 healthy individuals of three extreme Prakriti types, from a genetically homogeneous population of Western India. Unsupervised and supervised machine learning approaches were used to infer inherent structure of the data, and for feature selection and building classification models for Prakriti respectively. These models were validated in a North Indian population. Unsupervised clustering led to emergence of three natural clusters corresponding to three extreme Prakriti classes. The supervised modelling approaches could classify individuals, with distinct Prakriti types, in the training and validation sets. This study is the first to demonstrate that Prakriti types are distinct verifiable clusters within a multidimensional space of multiple interrelated phenotypic traits. It also provides a computational framework for predicting Prakriti classes from phenotypic attributes. This approach may be useful in precision medicine for stratification of endophenotypes in healthy and diseased populations.

Indexed as

Machine LearningMedicine, AyurvedicPhenotypeDisease SusceptibilityHumansIndiaPrecision MedicineSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID28981546
PMCPMC5628820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.