Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28981540›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Density-dependent signaling: An alternative hypothesis on the function of chemical signaling in a non-territorial solitary carnivore.

Clayton T Lamb, Garth Mowat, Sophie L Gilbert, Bruce N McLellan, Scott E Nielsen, Stan Boutin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Clayton T LambDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1961-0509
Garth MowatMinistry of Forests Lands and Natural Resource Operations, Nelson, British Columbia, Canada.
Sophie L GilbertDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Bruce N McLellanMinistry of Forests Lands and Natural Resource Operations, Nelson, British Columbia, Canada.
Scott E NielsenDepartment of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Stan BoutinDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brown bears are known to use rubbing behavior as a means of chemical communication, but the function of this signaling is unclear. One hypothesis that has gained support is that male bears rub to communicate dominance to other males. We tested the communication of dominance hypothesis in a low-density brown bear population in southeast British Columbia. We contrasted rubbing rates for male and female bears during and after the breeding season using ten years of DNA-mark-recapture data for 643 individuals. Here we demonstrate that male brown bears rub 60% more during the breeding than the non-breeding season, while female rubbing had no seasonal trends. Per capita rub rates by males were, on average, 2.7 times higher than females. Our results suggest that the function of rubbing in the Rocky Mountains may not only be to communicate dominance, but also to self-advertise for mate attraction. We propose that the role of chemical communication in this species may be density-dependent, where the need to self-advertise for mating is inversely related to population density and communicating for dominance increases with population density. We suggest that future endeavors to elucidate the function of rubbing should sample the behavior across a range of population densities using camera trap and genotypic data.

Indexed as

Animal CommunicationSocial DominanceAnimalsBritish ColumbiaFemaleMalePopulation DensityReproductionSeasonsSexual Behavior, AnimalUrsidae

Identifiers

PMID28981540
PMCPMC5628802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.