SynthesisEuropean journal of clinical investigation2018
Polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy treatment options: A meta-analysis.
Synthesis in European journal of clinical investigation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Comparative efficacy of photodynamic therapy (PDT), ranibizumab, aflibercept monotherapy, and combination therapies for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Pooled it
- The polyp regression rate and treatment prognosis of different interventions for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2021Pooled it
- Systematic review with network meta-analysis of antivascular endothelial growth factor use in managing polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy.Scientific reports · 2021Pooled it
- Polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy treatment options: A meta-analysis.European journal of clinical investigation · 2018Pooled it
- Combined Therapy Versus Fortified Anti-VEGF Monotherapy in Type C Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy: Long-Term Outcomes and Exploratory Biomarker Insights.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Profile of patients treated with intravitreal antiangiogenics in a Brazilian public service with high level of complexity.Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia · 2023Observational
- Discovering the Potential of Natural Antioxidants in Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Cost-Utility Analysis of Drug Treatments in Patients with Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy in Thailand.ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2021Article
- Efficacy of Initial vs. Delayed Photodynamic Therapy in Combination With Conbercept for Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Article
- The Efficacy of Conbercept in Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy: A Systematic Review.Journal of ophthalmology · 2020Review
- Six-Year Real-World Outcomes of Antivascular Endothelial Growth Factor Monotherapy and Combination Therapy for Various Subtypes of Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy.Journal of ophthalmology · 2019Article
- Choroidal Neovascularization: Mechanisms of Endothelial Dysfunction.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2019Review
- Polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy: An update on current management and review of literature.Taiwan journal of ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCombined treatment with intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) and verteporfin photodynamic therapy (PDT) is widely used for patients with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV), although clinical evidence regarding the therapeutic efficacy and safety of such treatment remains lacking. DESIGN/
methodsWe performed a meta-analysis of previously reported studies comparing combination treatment, PDT monotherapy, and anti-VEGF monotherapy. Primary outcome measures included changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT). The proportion of patients with polyp regression was regarded as the secondary outcome measure.
resultsTwenty studies (three RCTs and 19 retrospective studies) involving 1,178 patients with PCV were selected. Significant differences in the proportion of patients with polyps were observed between the PDT and anti-VEGF monotherapy groups at 3 and ≥6 months (P < .00001; and P = .0001, respectively). Significantly greater reductions in CRT were observed in the anti-VEGF than in the PDT group at the 3-month follow-up (P = .04). Significantly greater improvements in BCVA were observed in the combined therapy group than in the PDT monotherapy group at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months (P = .03; P = .005; P = .02; and P < .00001, respectively). Combined treatment also resulted in significantly greater improvements in BCVA than monotherapy with anti-VEGF at 6 and 24 months (P = .001; P < .00001, respectively), and significantly greater polyp regression than that observed following anti-VEGF treatment at 3 and ≥6 months (P < .00001; P < .0001, respectively).
conclusionsCombined therapy involving anti-VEGF agents and PDT may be more effective in improving long-term outcomes for patients with PCV than monotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.