Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28981139›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of clinical investigation2018

Polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy treatment options: A meta-analysis.

Tianwei Qian, Xinxin Li, Mengya Zhao, Xun Xu

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of clinical investigation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The polyp regression rate and treatment prognosis of different interventions for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy treatment options: A meta-analysis.European journal of clinical investigation · 2018
    Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tianwei QianDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Ocular Fundus Diseases, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7359-911X
Xinxin LiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Ocular Fundus Diseases, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Mengya ZhaoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Ocular Fundus Diseases, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Xun XuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Ocular Fundus Diseases, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCombined treatment with intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) and verteporfin photodynamic therapy (PDT) is widely used for patients with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV), although clinical evidence regarding the therapeutic efficacy and safety of such treatment remains lacking. DESIGN/

methodsWe performed a meta-analysis of previously reported studies comparing combination treatment, PDT monotherapy, and anti-VEGF monotherapy. Primary outcome measures included changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT). The proportion of patients with polyp regression was regarded as the secondary outcome measure.

resultsTwenty studies (three RCTs and 19 retrospective studies) involving 1,178 patients with PCV were selected. Significant differences in the proportion of patients with polyps were observed between the PDT and anti-VEGF monotherapy groups at 3 and ≥6 months (P < .00001; and P = .0001, respectively). Significantly greater reductions in CRT were observed in the anti-VEGF than in the PDT group at the 3-month follow-up (P = .04). Significantly greater improvements in BCVA were observed in the combined therapy group than in the PDT monotherapy group at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months (P = .03; P = .005; P = .02; and P < .00001, respectively). Combined treatment also resulted in significantly greater improvements in BCVA than monotherapy with anti-VEGF at 6 and 24 months (P = .001; P < .00001, respectively), and significantly greater polyp regression than that observed following anti-VEGF treatment at 3 and ≥6 months (P < .00001; P < .0001, respectively).

conclusionsCombined therapy involving anti-VEGF agents and PDT may be more effective in improving long-term outcomes for patients with PCV than monotherapy.

Indexed as

Angiogenesis InhibitorsChoroid DiseasesCombined Modality TherapyHumansIntravitreal InjectionsPhotochemotherapyPhotosensitizing AgentsPolypsPorphyrinsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVerteporfinVisual AcuityAngiogenesis InhibitorsPhotosensitizing AgentsPorphyrinsVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVerteporfincombination therapyintravitreal anti-VEGFmeta-analysisphotodynamic therapypolypoidal choroidal vasculopathy

Identifiers

PMID28981139
PMCPMC5771464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.