Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28980880›Full record

ArticleTranscription2018

Spurious transcription and its impact on cell function.

Joseph T Wade, David C Grainger

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transcription, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Transcription activation inEcoSal Plus · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Joseph T Wadea Wadsworth Center , New York State Department of Health , Albany , NY , USA.
David C Graingerc Institute of Microbiology and Infection, School of Biosciences, University of Birmingham , Edgbaston, Birmingham , UK.
University of Birmingham · GBWadsworth Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most RNA polymerases can initiate transcription from diverse DNA template sequences with relatively few outright sequence restraints. Recent reports have demonstrated that failure to subdue the promiscuity of RNA polymerase in vivo can severely impede cell function. This phenomenon appears common to all cell types with undesirable effects ranging from growth inhibition in prokaryotes to cancer in higher organisms. Here we discuss similarities and differences in strategies employed by cells to minimise spurious transcription across life's domains.

Indexed as

Promoter Regions, GeneticTranscription, GeneticAnimalsDNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesEscherichia coliHumansNeoplasmsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSchizosaccharomycesSubstrate SpecificityTranscription Initiation, GeneticDNA-Directed RNA PolymerasescancerE. coliH-NSRNA polymeraseS. cerevisiaeS. pombe

Identifiers

PMID28980880
PMCPMC5927700
OpenAlexW2761922717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.