Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28980440›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of older people nursing2018

Self-report pain assessment tools for cognitively intact older adults: Integrative review.

Youjeong Kang, George Demiris

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of older people nursing, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Facial Expressions as a Nexus for Health Assessment.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Pain in the Context of Virtual Neuropsychological Assessment of Older Adults.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Youjeong KangSchool of Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6229-4142
George DemirisSchool of Nursing & School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6318-5829
University of Washington · US

Funding

Aging and Informatics Training ProgramT32NR014833 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI THOMPSON, HILAIRE J · 2014 to 2018
$982k
NINR NIH HHS T32 NR014833
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPain is common in older adults, but it is often underreported or undertreated partly because many consider pain to be a normal consequence of ageing. Among the plethora of available self-report pain assessment tools, there is no synthetised evidence which tools are indicated for use among cognitively intact older adults. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: To understand documented self-report pain assessment tools that have been used among cognitively intact older adults, and to describe their characteristics including overall performance as well as studies demonstrating their use.

methodsA systematic search of the indexed databases PubMed, PsycINFO and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL Plus) was conducted to identify documented self-report pain assessment tools through peer-reviewed papers, including citations from January 1990 to December 2015. Thirty-five percentage of abstracts were independently evaluated by two raters according to specific criteria.

resultsAmong identified tools, the Iowa Pain Thermometer, the 6-point Verbal Descriptor Scale, the Numeric Rating Scale, the short form Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) and the Geriatric Pain Measure (GPM) may be suitable tools for self-reported pain by cognitively intact older adults based on the statement of the literature. Only two self-report tools (the GPM and the Geriatric Painful Events Inventory) were designed specifically for older adults.

conclusionsMore studies are needed to evaluate pain measures' psychometric performance across different settings, racial/ethnic groups and disease categories. Since 80% of older adults have at least one chronic disease, multidimensional tools such as the GPM may need to be used more often for accurate self-report of pain. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Examining the psychometric properties of comprehensive self-report pain assessment tools informs recommendations for the selection of tools to be used in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Self ReportAgedFemaleHumansMalePain Measurementageinggerontologyolder peoplepain assessment

Identifiers

PMID28980440
PMCPMC5886828
OpenAlexW2764151625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.