ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2017
Protein-protein interactions leave evolutionary footprints: High molecular coevolution at the core of interfaces.
Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bridging technical innovation and computational advances in studies of RNA-protein assemblies.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026Review
- Correlated Evolution Drives Structural Convergence of Interacting Proteins.Journal of molecular evolution · 2026Article
- Structural comparison of homologous protein-RNA interfaces reveals widespread overall conservation contrasted with versatility in polar contacts.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- SSEmb: A joint embedding of protein sequence and structure enables robust variant effect predictions.Nature communications · 2024Article
- A Comprehensive Study of De Novo Mutations on the Protein-Protein Interaction Interfaces Provides New Insights into Developmental Delay.Biomolecules · 2022Article
- Implications of disease-related mutations at protein-protein interfaces.Current opinion in structural biology · 2022Review
- Transmission distortion and genetic incompatibilities between alleles in a multigenerational mouse advanced intercross line.Genetics · 2022Article
- Computational Alanine Scanning Reveals Common Features of TCR/pMHC Recognition in HLA-DQ8-Associated Celiac Disease.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Article
- Simplified geometric representations of protein structures identify complementary interaction interfaces.Proteins · 2021Article
- Co-evolutionary landscape at the interface and non-interface regions of protein-protein interaction complexes.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021Article
- Bacteria use structural imperfect mimicry to hijack the host interactome.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- Comparative Structural Analysis of 20S Proteasome Ortholog Protein Complexes by Native Mass Spectrometry.ACS central science · 2020Article
- Engineering selective competitors for the discrimination of highly conserved protein-protein interaction modules.Nature communications · 2019Article
- Structural and Computational Characterization of Disease-Related Mutations Involved in Protein-Protein Interfaces.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Article
- Integrating co-evolutionary signals and other properties of residue pairs to distinguish biological interfaces from crystal contacts.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Protein-protein interactions are essential to all aspects of life. Specific interactions result from evolutionary pressure at the interacting interfaces of partner proteins. However, evolutionary pressure is not homogeneous within the interface: for instance, each residue does not contribute equally to the binding energy of the complex. To understand functional differences between residues within the interface, we analyzed their properties in the core and rim regions. Here, we characterized protein interfaces with two evolutionary measures, conservation and coevolution, using a comprehensive dataset of 896 protein complexes. These scores can detect different selection pressures at a given position in a multiple sequence alignment. We also analyzed how the number of interactions in which a residue is involved influences those evolutionary signals. We found that the coevolutionary signal is higher in the interface core than in the interface rim region. Additionally, the difference in coevolution between core and rim regions is comparable to the known difference in conservation between those regions. Considering proteins with multiple interactions, we found that conservation and coevolution increase with the number of different interfaces in which a residue is involved, suggesting that more constraints (i.e., a residue that must satisfy a greater number of interactions) allow fewer sequence changes at those positions, resulting in higher conservation and coevolution values. These findings shed light on the evolution of protein interfaces and provide information useful for identifying protein interfaces and predicting protein-protein interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.