Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28980258›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2017

Calibrating Population Stratification in Association Analysis.

Huaizhen Qin, Xiaofeng Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Huaizhen QinDepartment of Global Biostatistics and Data Science, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA, 70112, USA. hqin2@tulane.edu.
Xiaofeng ZhuDepartment of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.

Funding

Statistical methods for analyzing high-throughput genotype dataR01HG003054 · NHGRI · LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO · PI ZHU, XIAOFENG · 2005 to 2017
$3.6M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG003054
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In genetic association studies, it is necessary to correct for population structure to avoid inference bias. During the past decade, prevailing corrections often only involved adjustments of global ancestry differences between sampled individuals. Nevertheless, population structure may vary across local genomic regions due to the variability of local ancestries associated with natural selection, migration, or random genetic drift. Adjusting for global ancestry alone may be inadequate when local population structure is an important confounding factor. In contrast, adjusting for local ancestry can more effectively prevent false positives due to local population structure. To more accurately locate disease genes, we recommend adjusting for local ancestries by interrogating local structure. In practice, locus-specific ancestries are usually unknown and must be inferred. For recently admixed populations with known reference ancestral populations, locus-specific ancestries can be inferred accurately using some hidden Markov model-based methods. However, SNP-wise ancestries cannot be accurately inferred when ancestral population information is not available. For such scenarios, we propose employing local principal components (PCs) to present local ancestries and adjusting for local PCs when testing for gene-phenotype association.

Indexed as

Genetic Association StudiesGenetic DriftGenetics, PopulationHumansMarkov ChainsPolymorphism, Single NucleotidePrincipal Component AnalysisSelection, GeneticSoftwareAdmixed populationsFine mappingGenome-wide association studiesGlobal ancestryHidden Markov algorithmsLocal ancestriesLocal principal componentsMigrationNatural selectionRandom genetic drift

Identifiers

PMID28980258
PMCPMC6348008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.