Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28980207›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental geochemistry and health2018

Soil eaten by chacma baboons adsorbs polar plant secondary metabolites representative of those found in their diet.

Chieu Anh Kim Ta, Paula A Pebsworth, Rui Liu, Stephen Hillier, Nia Gray, John T Arnason, Sera L Young

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental geochemistry and health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Chieu Anh Kim TaDepartment of Biology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, K1N 6N5, Canada.
Paula A PebsworthDepartment of Anthropology, The University of Texas, San Antonio, TX, 78249, USA. ppebsworth@mac.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8865-8389
Rui LiuDepartment of Biology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, K1N 6N5, Canada.
Stephen HillierJames Hutton Institute, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen, AB15 8QH, Scotland, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9652-9950
Nia GrayJames Hutton Institute, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen, AB15 8QH, Scotland, UK.
John T ArnasonDepartment of Biology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, K1N 6N5, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5354-5715
Sera L YoungDepartment of Anthropology, Institute for Policy Research, Northwestern University, Evanston, 60208, IL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1763-1218
University of Ottawa · CAJames Hutton Institute · GBNorthwestern University · USThe University of Texas at San Antonio · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Geophagy, the deliberate consumption of earth materials, is common among humans and animals. However, its etiology and function(s) remain poorly understood. The major hypotheses about its adaptive functions are the supplementation of essential elements and the protection against temporary and chronic gastrointestinal (GI) distress. Because much less work has been done on the protection hypothesis, we investigated whether soil eaten by baboons protected their GI tract from plant secondary metabolites (PSMs) and described best laboratory practices for doing so. We tested a soil that baboons eat/preferred, a soil that baboons never eat/non-preferred, and two clay minerals, montmorillonite a 2:1 clay and kaolinite a 1:1 clay. These were processed using a technique that simulated physiological digestion. The phytochemical concentration of 10 compounds representative of three biosynthetic classes of compounds found in the baboon diet was then assessed with and without earth materials using high-performance liquid chromatography with diode-array detection (HPLC-DAD). The preferred soil was white, contained 1% halite, 45% illite/mica, 14% kaolinite, and 0.8% sand; the non-preferred soil was pink, contained 1% goethite and 1% hematite but no halite, 40% illite/mica, 19% kaolinite, and 3% sand. Polar phenolics and alkaloids were generally adsorbed at levels 10× higher than less polar terpenes. In terms of PSM adsorption, the montmorillonite was more effective than the kaolinite, which was more effective than the non-preferred soil, which was more effective than the preferred soil. Our findings suggest that HPLC-DAD is best practice for the assessment of PSM adsorption of earth materials due to its reproducibility and accuracy. Further, soil selection was not based on adsorption of PSMs, but on other criteria such as color, mouth feel, and taste. However, the consumption of earth containing clay minerals could be an effective strategy for protecting the GI tract from PSMs.

Indexed as

DietSecondary MetabolismSoilAlkaloidsAluminum SilicatesAnimalsChromatography, High Pressure LiquidClayFeeding BehaviorIntestinal AbsorptionPapioPhenolsPicaPlantsReproducibility of ResultsSpectrophotometry, UltravioletAlkaloidsAluminum SilicatesClayPhenolsSoilDetoxificationHPLC–DADMethodsPicaPlant toxin adsorptionSimulated digestionSoil eating

Identifiers

PMID28980207
OpenAlexW2761582468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.