ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2018
Long-term outcomes of robotic mesh sacrocolpopexy.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Surgical Challenge of the Repeat Sacrocolpopexy.International urogynecology journal · 2026Review
- Very long-term outcomes of robotic mesh sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse repair.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Article
- Single-center study for robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacropexies: a one-fits-all strategy for pelvic organ prolapse?Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2022Article
- Challenges of Managing Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in Women with Tamoxifen Use.Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.) · 2022Article
- New "Wrinkle Method" for Intracorporeal Anterior Vaginal Wall Plication during Sacrocolpopexy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Robotic Sacrocolpopexy for Treatment of Apical Compartment Prolapse.International neurourology journal · 2020Article
- Vaginal cuff perforation during robotic-assisted mesh recto-sacrocolpopexy.IJU case reports · 2020Article
- Robotic-assisted repair of pelvic organ prolapse: a scoping review of the literature.Translational andrology and urology · 2020Article
- Robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with autologous fascia lata: technique and initial outcomes.International urogynecology journal · 2019Article
- Techniques - Robotic-assisted laparoscopic implantation of artificial urinary sphincter with concomitant hysterectomy and sacrocolpopexy.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2019Article
- Robotic sacrocolpopexy for the management of pelvic organ prolapse: quality of life outcomes.Therapeutic advances in urologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of the study is to evaluate anatomic and functional late-term outcomes of robotic mesh sacrocolpopexy (RMS) at a single tertiary-care institution. Following IRB approval, a retrospective chart review of a prospectively collected database on consecutive patients who underwent RMS for symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse and had 3 year minimum follow-up was performed. Data collected included physical examination, validated questionnaires including Urogenital Distress Inventory, Incontinence Impact Questionnaire, and global Quality of Life (QOL). The primary outcome was failure defined as the need for re-operation and/or prolapse recurrence by examination. Those with office follow-up < 36 months underwent structured phone interviews. Between 12/2007 and 2/2012, 56 women underwent RMS. Thirty women had follow-up ≥ 3 years (median 64 (IQR 48-85) months). Mean C-point went from - 2.33 (range 0 to - 5) to - 9.00 (0 to - 12) (p < 0.01), and mean QOL score from 3.93 (0-10) to 1.93 (0-8) (p < 0.01). Two developed recurrent vault prolapse later on at 26 and 34 months, respectively. Four women (13%) required surgery for secondary prolapses, with three for anterior compartment and one for posterior compartment. Sixteen of twenty six were contacted via structured phone interviews, with 14 doing well, one deceased, and one who underwent a secondary posterior compartment prolapse 6 years later at an outside facility. This long-term study indicates durability for RMS in the management of symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28980173What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.